Tuesday, December 18, 2007

I Didn’t Screw Her and That Kid’s Not Mine, I Swear It!

I am livid. Simply livid.

As you all know, I started therapy a few weeks ago. Already, I have had to miss one appointment because of my job and the incompetence of my co-worker. Now, I have to miss another one. Not only that, but I also have to work out the entire remainder of the week and Christmas Eve with no help at all because of this same co-worker.

Let me begin by stating some facts about this person. He is a 59-year-old man who has a 45-year-old wife. This wife has 7 children, 4 of which are under the age of 18. He (we’ll call him “Joe”) and his wife (we’ll call her “tits on a boar hog” as in useless) have been married for 4 years now and he has been with the company I work for (which shall remain nameless) for a little over 1 year. During the course of this past year, his wife has quit two jobs and been fired from one, which was her most recent. She was terminated for excessive absenteeism. This is a result of having so many kids. Well, it’s actually because she is one of those people that feels like she should stay at home any time one of her children has the sniffles. With 6 (tits on a boar hog, Joe and their 4 short, retarded people who refuse to pay rent) people living in a 3 bedroom house, the sniffles never really go away. Within the span of 90 days, this woman missed 15 days! You read that right, 15 days! That adds up to 3 days for each child and 3 for herself. Granted, she has some female health problems, but she didn’t take all of those days off for herself.

This would have no bearing on me, except that Joe takes time off from work so that he can “take care of her”. Goddamn you fucking piece of shit, she 45 goddamned years old! Has she not figured out how to take care of herself after this much time?!?!? It’s not my fault that she used her vulva as if it were a Pez dispenser! Typically, after the first couple of kids you figure out what causes that condition and you take precautions. But not this silly twat. No, she expects everyone else to take up her slack and to make special arrangements for her as if she were somehow handicapped. She actually complained about her new employer firing her with a tone of righteous indignation. Sorry you fucking idiot, I should not have to work myself into an early grave because you were too stupid to say no or use a fucking condom and your new husband is silly enough to marry your immature and selfish ass. Your employer should not have to grant you more time off simply because you didn’t have sense enough to close your legs. It’s not my fault that every time you have a sore vagina that you have to stay at home and your husband of the old balls has to take care of you like you were his child instead of his wife. Maybe, just maybe, if you didn’t spend so much time using your uterus like it was a fetal storage unit your pussy wouldn’t hurt so badly! Did you ever think of that? Her youngest child is 11 and her oldest is 21. That means she spent about 10 years of her life pregnant or recovering from pregnancy. I’m starting to think that she was the role model for the Cabbage Patch Kids factory. When kids’ parents told the story of babies being found underneath a cabbage leaf, the cabbage leaf was just a euphemism for this woman.

Don’t get me wrong, I totally get the idea of wanting to take care of your wife when she’s sick or injured. However, at some point enough has to be enough. If my wife were seriously ill and needed my help, you can bet your ass that I would do everything I could to take care of her and provide for her. What I wouldn’t do, however, is expect that everyone else is going to make unnecessary sacrifices so that I may do so or that I will be granted special privileges from my employer. The world just doesn’t work that way. What makes this situation worse is that Joe ran out of paid time off about 3 months ago and is now being granted a week’s time off with pay right before Christmas. When we scheduled our vacation times earlier this year, I was told I could not have time off at Christmas because I did not have the seniority to do it and that I would have to wait my turn. Joe was hired at the same pay rate that I was and was granted more PTO than I receive and was hired a year after me. Now he is getting a paid week off simply because his wife’s pussy is falling out and she needs a hysterectomy (typically an outpatient procedure, mind you) right before the holidays. Now that I think about it, his wife also had a “procedure” scheduled right before Thanksgiving as well. Seems mighty coincidental, eh? Fuck it. What can I do?

Oh, and did I mention that I was livid?

**My apologies if the preceding rant offended anyone. It was not meant to be sexist in any way.

Monday, December 17, 2007

Merry Christmas!

I’ve been sitting back and watching a handful of situations as of late. Watching these situations has led me to ask a few questions.

The first thing that I observed is that Americans spent a total of $20 BILLION dollars in one day on the day after Thanksgiving. This actually leads me to several questions. Why do we need to spend that much money over the course of one 24-hour period? Why couldn’t we be satisfied with spending only $10 billion and either giving the other $10 billion to charity or just saving it for retirement? If we can afford to spend that kind of money in one day on what amounts to future land fill, then why are so many people in foreclosure on their homes and why are there so many people filing for bankruptcy?

Another thing I have noticed is that people are donating their hard-earned dollars to political campaigns. This is not a bad thing in and of itself. But let’s look at the amount of money being donated and spent during the campaigns for President in 2008. According to OpenSecrets.org, the combined total spent (for the third quarter) on the Democrat side of the campaign is $133,516,245 with cash on hand in the amount of $110,888,289. On the Republican side of this, the total spent is $132,445,115 with cash on hand in the amount of $42,921,787. In terms of donations, the Democrats had a total of $244,404,140 and Republicans had $175,336,955; each of these figures spanning the entire length of the campaign by the end of the third quarter. This means that American corporations and people donated a total of $419,741,095 to Presidential campaigns. I think that this is funny considering that, much like the Highlander, there can be only one. The race for the Presidency has effectively turned into a gigantic horse race, with corporations representing the hardcore gambling junkie. I think that it’s kind of sickening to know that Americans have this kind of money to just effectively throw away, yet there are still homeless people here. It’s sickening to think that we have this kind of disposable money, yet the education system is falling apart. It’s sickening to think that we have all of this disposable money floating around, yet we cannot work on an alternative fuel source in order reduce our dependency on foreign oil. It makes no sense to me.

Let’s focus on the homeless problem for the moment. It was estimated that there were approximately 750,000 homeless people in the United States this year. If we (as in American people and corporations) were to reduce the amount that we donated (according to the stats I quoted previously) to political campaigns by 50% and committed this amount to the cause of eradicating homelessness, we would have $209,870,547.50 going toward this cause. This only amounts to $279 per person, but it’s better than nothing, which is what you get when you donate to a losing political campaign. Let’s add the amounts that I spoke of in the beginning of this blog, which is how much was spent in one day of holiday shopping. The amount was $20 billion. Reduce it by 50% and split that total among 750,000 people and you get more than $13,000 per person. That’s a pretty significant amount. If 4 of those people are a family, that’s $52,000, which is more than enough to pay the rent on an apartment for a year. Hell, that’s probably enough to pay their grocery bill and most of their bills for basic living expenses altogether for a year. How many families do you know who live on less than that right now? Thinking about it, every family I know right now lives on less than that. I’m one of them. I’ve lived on less than that my entire life.

I think that the major problem with we Americans is that we try too hard to live the “American Dream”. This dream is great, but not when it comes at the expense of other people. We are so busy trying to be this new and bastardized version of what we think an American is supposed to be that we have forgotten that we are human first. I think that we need to drop the superiority complex and adopt an equality complex. Sorry, but your kid doesn’t have a need for a $500 gaming system when the kid down the street doesn’t have enough food to eat even though their parents are doing everything they can. Your kid doesn’t need new $100 Nike sneakers when the soles of the shoes on the kid down the street are being held in place by duct tape and Shoe Goo and are 2 sizes too small. Your kid doesn’t need a $200 Starter jacket when the kid down the street doesn’t even have heat in his house. Think about these things. So many people spend so much time worrying about what kind of gift they are going to buy their loved one for the holidays. They never stop to think that they are giving out gifts to people on a day that is not their birthday. The real gift is reflection on your life and recognizing just how fortunate you really are to be alive, healthy and surrounded by people who care about you.

Oh, and if you are one of those assholes that gets pissed off when a person says “Merry Christmas” when you are not a person who celebrates Christmas… FUCK YOU, you FUCKING DICKHEAD! You should be glad that they didn’t just spit in your face, kick you in the crotch, punch you in the throat and steal your wallet. If I say Merry Christmas and you get indignant about it, you’re likely to get all of the above from me, minus the stealing of your wallet just because I’m not a thief.

Wednesday, December 5, 2007

Dead Relatives as Jewelry?

This is kind of weird. Creepy almost. I suppose it’s better than some kid from Sierra Leone losing an arm in a diamond mine so you can put some useless rock onto the hand of your equally useless wife-to-be. I say she’s useless because, by expecting a diamond for an engagement ring, she is actually determining how much you love her by how much you are willing to spend on a piece of jewelry. If they were quality people, they would just say something like: “Why not just go spend the 3 months’ salary you were going to spend on a ring and put it in an I.R.A. for our future?” They might even say: “save that 3 months’ salary for a nursery for our baby or a savings account for our children’s college tuition?” But no, they have to have a rock. Who are these silly people, Wilma Flintstone wannabees? Do we all live in Bedrock all of a sudden? Forgive me if I’m mistaken, but I thought we’d progressed beyond the need as a species for pointless and vanity-laden decoration.

The same goes for all of these rappers and their “bling”. They’re even more useless than these goofy people who need a diamond as an affirmation of love. They’re more useless because there isn’t even any historical precedent for what they do. It’s nothing but a status symbol. Why do they need a ring that covers the entire top of their hand and spells out their rapper name? Why do they need a Rolex watch covered in diamonds when a Timex will do? Why do they need a 1-inch-thick platinum chain that is 3 feet long with a diamond-encrusted 9 MM as a pendant? Why not just buy the same thing in cubic Zirconium? It looks the same but costs a tenth of the price. Take the other nine-tenths and put it into a money-market account for Christ’s sake! Lord knows your fame and fortune isn't going to last.

Thursday, November 29, 2007

We Speak English Here, Do You?

Speak English, Nancy: Pelosi stiffs the Salvation Army

Tuesday, Nov. 20, 2007

WHEN SHOULD it be illegal for a boss to require that employees speak English? If radical members of the U.S. House have their way, the answer will be almost always, if not always.

After the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued the Salvation Army for firing two Hispanic employees in Framingham, Mass., earlier this year, the question has become a hot political topic.

The Salvation Army, which has an English-only policy, had given the women, and all employees, a year to learn English. The two, whose job was to sort clothes, refused. They were fired.

The EEOC called this discrimination. But that's nonsense.

According to the EEOC, businesses can adopt English-only policies only in certain circumstances, such as when employees directly interact with the public or for safety reasons.

That means that employers cannot insist that all employees speak the same language the boss, the police, firefighters and customers speak. This is absurd.

Unfortunately, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi doesn't think so. Caving to the demands of radical Hispanic members of her own party, she is refusing to bring to a vote a Senate-passed provision relaxing federal rules on employer English-only policies.

That provision, sponsored by Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., passed in the Senate 75-19. But Speaker Pelosi is going to kill it to please extremists Hispanics in the Democratic Party.

The federal government must not be able to force businesses to employ people who can't or won't speak English. That's just common sense. But common sense doesn't seem to be understood in Nancy Pelosi's office. Maybe if someone explained it to her in Spanish, she'd get it.

 

MY COMMENTARY

On the surface, I would say that this is probably discrimination on the part of the Salvation Army. However, is it really? Is it unreasonable to expect an employee who works for you to be able to speak the same language as you or as the majority of the other employees who work for you? Better yet, is it reasonable for the government to force you as an employer to have to learn another language or to make arrangements over and above a paycheck and benefits for someone who is not disabled in some way?

Another question I have is this: what makes anyone think that this will only apply to Hispanics? What about people who speak Mandarin Chinese? What about the Vietnamese? What about people who speak Arabic, Farsi, Persian, Hebrew, Russian, Greek, French, Japanese, Italian, German, Polish, Yiddish, Swahili or whatever other language anyone wants to speak? Where is their protection? See, that seems to be a major problem. How do we protect the rights of one group of people without infringing on the rights of another group? I'm not saying that the Salvation Army is not discriminating. I don't know that because I don't know their policy. What I am saying is that I believe that, if their policy dictates that their employees speak English while on the job, that they are within their rights as a business to make that rule. Another thing that I am saying is that Nancy Pelosi is one of the weakest politicians that I have ever heard of.

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

"You have failed us miserably and we won't take it any more."

Address by Mayor Ross C. "Rocky" Anderson
Today, as we come together once again in this great city, we raise our voices in unison to say to President Bush, to Vice President Cheney, to other members of the Bush Administration (past and present), to a majority of Congress, including Utah's entire congressional delegation, and to much of the mainstream media: "You have failed us miserably and we won't take it any more."


"While we had every reason to expect far more of you, you have been pompous, greedy, cruel, and incompetent as you have led this great nation to a moral, military, and national security abyss."


"You have breached trust with the American people in the most egregious ways. You have utterly failed in the performance of your jobs. You have undermined our Constitution, permitted the violation of the most fundamental treaty obligations, and betrayed the rule of law."


"You have engaged in, or permitted, heinous human rights abuses of the sort never before countenanced in our nation's history as a matter of official policy. You have sent American men and women to kill and be killed on the basis of lies, on the basis of shifting justifications, without competent leadership, and without even a coherent plan for this monumental blunder."

"We are here to tell you: We won't take it any more!"

"You have acted in direct contravention of values that we, as Americans who love our country, hold dear. You have deceived us in the most cynical, outrageous ways. You have undermined, or allowed the undermining of, our constitutional system of checks and balances among the three presumed co-equal branches of government. You have helped lead our nation to the brink of fascism, of a dictatorship contemptuous of our nation's treaty obligations, federal statutory law, our Constitution, and the rule of law."

"Because of you, and because of your jingoistic false 'patriotism,' our world is far more dangerous, our nation is far more despised, and the threat of terrorism is far greater than ever before.
It has been absolutely astounding how you have committed the most horrendous acts, causing such needless tragedy in the lives of millions of people, yet you wear your so-called religion on your sleeves, asserting your God-is-on-my-side nonsense – when what you have done flies in the face of any religious or humanitarian tradition. Your hypocrisy is mind-boggling – and disgraceful. What part of "Thou shalt not kill" do you not understand? What part of the "Golden rule" do you not understand? What part of "be honest," "be responsible," and "be accountable" don't you understand? What part of "Blessed are the peacekeepers" do you not understand?

Because of you, hundreds of thousands of people have been killed, many thousands of people have suffered horrendous lifetime injuries, and millions have been run off from their homes. For the sake of our nation, for the sake of our children, and for the sake of our brothers and sisters around the world, we are morally compelled to say, as loudly as we can, 'We won't take it any more!' "

"As United States agents kidnap, disappear, and torture human beings around the world, you justify, you deceive, and you cover up. We find what you have done to men, women and children, and to the good name and reputation of the United States, so appalling, so unconscionable, and so outrageous as to compel us to call upon you to step aside and allow other men and women who are competent, true to our nation's values, and with high moral principles to stand in your places – for the good of our nation, for the good of our children, and for the good of our world."

In the case of the President and Vice President, this means impeachment and removal from office, without any further delay from a complacent, complicit Congress, the Democratic majority of which cares more about political gain in 2008 than it does about the vindication of our Constitution, the rule of law, and democratic accountability.

It means the election of people as President and Vice President who, unlike most of the presidential candidates from both major parties, have not aided and abetted in the perpetration of the illegal, tragic, devastating invasion and occupation of Iraq. And it means the election of people as President and Vice President who will commit to return our nation to the moral and strategic imperative of refraining from torturing human beings.

In the case of the majority of Congress, it means electing people who are diligent enough to learn the facts, including reading available National Intelligence Estimates, before voting to go to war. It means electing to Congress men and women who will jealously guard Congress's sole prerogative to declare war. It means electing to Congress men and women who will not submit like vapid lap dogs to presidential requests for blank checks to engage in so-called preemptive wars, for legislation permitting warrantless wiretapping of communications involving US citizens, and for dangerous, irresponsible, saber-rattling legislation like the recent Kyl-Lieberman amendment.
We must avoid the trap of focusing the blame solely upon President Bush and Vice-President Cheney. This is not just about a few people who have wronged our country – and the world.

They were enabled by members of both parties in Congress, they were enabled by the pathetic mainstream news media, and, ultimately, they have been enabled by the American people – 40% of whom are so ill-informed they still think Iraq was behind the 9/11 attacks – a people who know and care more about baseball statistics and which drunken starlets are wearing underwear than they know and care about the atrocities being committed every single day in our name by a government for which we need to take responsibility.

As loyal Americans, without regard to political partisanship -- as veterans, as teachers, as religious leaders, as working men and women, as students, as professionals, as businesspeople, as public servants, as retirees, as people of all ages, races, ethnic origins, sexual orientations, and faiths -- we are here to say to the Bush administration, to the majority of Congress, and to the mainstream media: "You have violated your solemn responsibilities. You have undermined our democracy, spat upon our Constitution, and engaged in outrageous, despicable acts. You have brought our nation to a point of immorality, inhumanity, and illegality of immense, tragic, unprecedented proportions."

"But we will live up to our responsibilities as citizens, as brothers and sisters of those who have suffered as a result of the imperial bullying of the United States government, and as moral actors who must take a stand: And we will, and must, mean it when we say 'We won't take it any more.'"

If we want principled, courageous elected officials, we need to be principled, courageous, and tenacious ourselves. History has demonstrated that our elected officials are not the leaders – the leadership has to come from us. If we don't insist, if we don't persist, then we are not living up to our responsibilities as citizens in a democracy – and our responsibilities as moral human beings.

If we remain silent, we signal to Congress and the Bush administration – and to candidates running for office – and to the world – that we support the status quo.
Silence is complicity. Only by standing up for what's right and never letting down can we say we are doing our part.
Our government, on the basis of a campaign we now know was entirely fraudulent, attacked and militarily occupied a nation that posed no danger to the United States. Our government, acting in our name, has caused immense, unjustified death and destruction.

It all started five years ago, yet where have we, the American people, been? At this point, we are responsible. We get together once in a while at demonstrations and complain about Bush and Cheney, about Congress, and about the pathetic news media. We point fingers and yell a lot. Then most people politely go away until another demonstration a few months later.

How many people can honestly say they have spent as much time learning about and opposing the outrages of the Bush administration as they have spent watching sports or mindless television programs during the past five years? Escapist, time-sapping sports and insipid entertainment have indeed become the opiate of the masses.

Why is this country so sound asleep? Why do we abide what is happening to our nation, to our Constitution, to the cause of peace and international law and order? Why are we not doing all in our power to put an end to this madness?
We should be in the streets regularly and students should be raising hell on our campuses. We should be making it clear in every way possible that apologies or convoluted, disingenuous explanations just don't cut it when presidential candidates and so many others voted to authorize George Bush and his neo-con buddies to send American men and women to attack and occupy Iraq.

Let's awaken, and wake up the country by committing here and now to do all each of us can to take our nation back. Let them hear us across the country, as we ask others to join us: "We won't take it any more!"

I implore you: Draw a line. Figure out exactly where your own moral breaking point is. How much will you put up with before you say "No more" and mean it?

I have drawn my line as a matter of simple personal morality: I cannot, and will not, support any candidate who has voted to fund the atrocities in Iraq. I cannot, and will not, support any candidate who will not commit to remove all US troops, as soon as possible, from Iraq. I cannot, and will not, support any candidate who has supported legislation that takes us one step closer to attacking Iran. I cannot, and will not, support any candidate who has not fought to stop the kidnapping, disappearances, and torture being carried on in our name.

If we expect our nation's elected officials to take us seriously, let us send a powerful message they cannot misunderstand. Let them know we really do have our moral breaking point. Let them know we have drawn a bright line. Let them know they cannot take our support for granted – that, regardless of their party and regardless of other political considerations, they will not have our support if they cannot provide, and have not provided, principled leadership.

The people of this nation may have been far too quiet for five years, but let us pledge that we won't let it go on one more day – that we will do all we can to put an end to the illegalities, the moral degradation, and the disintegration of our nation's reputation in the world.

Let us be unified in drawing the line – in declaring that we do have a moral breaking point. Let us insist, together, in supporting our troops and in gratitude for the freedoms for which our veterans gave so much, that we bring our troops home from Iraq, that we return our government to a constitutional democracy, and that we commit to honoring the fundamental principles of human rights.

In defense of our country, in defense of our Constitution, in defense of our shared values as Americans – and as moral human beings – we declare today that we will fight in every way possible to stop the insanity, stop the continued military occupation of Iraq, and stop the moral depravity reflected by the kidnapping, disappearing, and torture of people around the world.

SOURCE

Monday, November 5, 2007

Had to post this for posterity...

As has come to be expected by me, Keith Olbermann nails it!

Wednesday, October 31, 2007

My Letter to the Editor

Do you think that they will print this?


To Whom It May Concern (which is ALL of you):

What is it that you are all so afraid of? Is it death? If it is, I can guarantee you with 100% certainty that death is something that you cannot escape, no matter who or where it comes from.

Is it the death of a loved one? If so, I can guarantee you with 100% certainty that neither they, nor you, nor I can stop that either.

Is it terrorism? If so, I can guarantee you, although not 100%, that the government that you cowards have charged with coddling you cannot and, more importantly, will not protect you from. Just look at what happened at Virginia Tech. Where was your PATRIOT Act then?

There are only 4 absolute truths in human life. They are as follows: you must eat food, you must drink water, you must breathe air and you must die. That’s it. Nothing else in life is absolute. Nothing else in life is mandatory.

For me, however, there is one other thing that is necessary in my life. That necessity is freedom. That necessity is the liberty which was guaranteed to me by the United States Constitution, written by men much more intelligent and far wiser than I. That necessity is the freedom which is so bravely defended and upheld by men and women much more courageous than I. That necessity is the freedom which is the very life blood of the nation that we call home. That nation which was, at one time, a brightly shining beacon of hope and an example for all to follow. That nation which has been tarnished, as of late, by men and women who are hungry for power and drunken with greed. That nation which has been buried under massive quantities of incompetence and sociopathy. My necessity is the full restoration of my home and seeing her taking her rightful place at the forefront of the cause of freedom the world over. Not through empire-building. Not through force. Not at the barrel of a rifle or the exploding of a bomb dropped from the air or a missile fired from miles away. No. I want my country to spread freedom or, more accurately, the desire for freedom through example and by displays of even-handed compassion.

When are the rest of you cowards going to wake up and see that your desire for safety is costing you the very thing that you were born into? When are you going to wake up and tell your leaders that you will not sacrifice your freedoms for safety, not even for a second and not even temporarily, particularly when they are so inept at protecting you? When are you going to stop quaking in your shoes and hiding behind the skirts of your mothers and say “enough is enough”? Killing hundreds of thousands of people does nothing to stop terrorism, which is what you all fear. It only exacerbates the problem and creates more terrorists. Intense desperation, when left unaddressed, breeds more intense desperation. It defies all logic and common sense to assume that one can stop or prevent terrorism through violent means or economic sanction. What will it take for you all to realize that you cannot trust the government that leads you at this very moment? The government that has made you hated for your nationality throughout the world in which you were once revered and respected. The government that lied to you and made you believe that Iraq was out to get you and that they were somehow behind the awful attacks on 9/11. The government that is now directly responsible for the deaths of 100,000 people, at minimum. The government that is, as I write this, trying to convince you that a nation with the same first 3 letters as Iraq is trying to hurt us. How many times must you be deceived before you stop believing the lie? Judging from the divorce, spousal abuse and child abuse rates in this country, I’d say that you have less tolerance for the people that you love than you do for the government that ru(i)ns your life. How sad is that? Ask yourselves these questions every morning while you brush your teeth and style your hair after 4 hours of restless sleep so that you can hurry up and sit in horrible traffic alongside dozens of soccer moms riding alone in their Ford Expeditions and Chevy Suburbans while putting on too much makeup in order to get to that job that barely pays your bills yet you cannot afford to lose.

Then again, why should I expect so much introspection from a people who display little to no sense of personal accountability? For a minute there, I almost forgot that I live in the nation of “It’s not my fault”. A nation full of people who rely on Dr. Phil and Oprah to give them advice on living, while not realizing that those two people have no real basis in reality any longer because they are far richer than you will ever be and they got that way by dispensing “invaluable advice” to morons like you. A nation that watches television and sees the commercials for the latest in erectile dysfunction treatments and thinks that this is the most important advancement in science ever. A nation that thinks that the latest display of Britney Spears’ well-used vagina on national television while getting out of her car immediately after plowing into a parked car while giggling and exclaiming “Oops, I did it again” is perfectly acceptable as tonight’s top story.

Prove me wrong. I challenge you.


With total sincerity;

Vincent R. ******

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Fact or Fiction? You Decide

Okay. Let me start out by stating, for the record, that I did not write the article that follows. I was looking at my favorite website (WhatReallyHappened) and a link was posted there redirecting to this. I am posting this story in full because it states, almost verbatim, my theory about what happened on Rudy Ghouliani's version of Christmas, 9/11. SO read on and determine for yourselves what you think. Then let me know.

-Vince

TBR News October 22, 2007

SOURCE


Editor’s note: We have always taken a highly dubious view of the many stories of a conspiratorial nature that have sprung up after the 9/11 attack. It is obvious that many are not based on facts nor logic but the continuing flood of doubt certainly indicates that the American public is generally disillusioned and has turned to theory to explain matters that to them cannot be explained away. Some of this questioning is very much to the point and it is very obvious that much has been put out as deliberate disinformation. However, when we received the attached article, we read it through very carefully, prepared to push the delete button but of all the various theories and suppositions offered to date, it makes the most sense. And, unlike many other suppositions and theories, it stands up will to the application of known, provable facts. So in this issue, we will devote almost all the space to this article and would certainly welcome reasoned responses. The Editor

Controlling the News

Some three months ago, I assumed my duties at a national media chain.

Shortly after I arrived, a senior staff member, a woman of some age and great determination, took ill with what was diagnosed as a form of cancer and she had to take a protracted medical leave to have it treated. After she had been gone a month, corporate became concerned because she was the one who received and allotted stories on national security.

Her prognosis was guarded ,so my immediate superior, at the top of the food chain, told me to look into her files and see if there was anything that might be needed currently. She had four large filing cabinets in her office, all locked. Before having them opened, I checked with the staff at her clinic and explained our position.

Her oncologist told me that she might recover in time but would not be able to return to work for at least six months. Later that night, we had a discreet locksmith come into the building. I personally guided them past our security people downstairs in the lobby. It took about five minutes to open all the locks and they then left.

For the next three days, I personally waded through hundreds of files going back to the Eisenhower presidency. Most of the material was interesting but little of it was of any current use.

However, in one cabinet, there were stacks of what appeared, and later proved , to be copies sent to our staffer by Israeli sources, both from the Israeli Embassy people in D.C. and from other sources in Israel. These were very interesting (to say the very least) and many bore on the current situation in the Middle East.

One file in particular was astonishing.

It was an Israeli post mortem analysis of the 9-11 attack, complied from their inside sources in May of 2003, and one of the most remarkable historical chronicles I have ever read.

That file in particular had a note with her name printed at the top that it was never to be shown to anyone under any circumstances. Reading it through, I can see why. I put all the other files back in place and made photo copies of some of the more sensitive ones before doing so.

That’s the background. And here is the complete report.

You will note that there are a number of comments and explanations in italics. Those are mine and are taken from reliable sources and duly noted.

Insofar as controlling the news is concerned, this is a prime, even classic, example of that oeuvre. When you read it, you will understand why no media outlet in the United States would ever dare address its contents.

AN ANALYSIS OF THE TERRORIST ATTACKS ON AMERICAN TARGETS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 WITH APPROPRIATE BACKGROUND INFORMATION

· The Initial attack on the World Trade Center

On Friday, February 26, 1993, at approximately 12:18 PM, a huge car bomb exploded in the Secret Service section of the underground garage of the World Trade Center in New York. The blast killed five people and injured many more The concrete ceiling over the Path subway station collapsed and the casualties were killed by the debris. The blast destroyed three floors of reinforced concrete and set off fires that sent dense clouds of smoke up into one of the two towers. Power was interdicted and the lighting and elevator systems were not functioning.

Many thousands of office workers had to be evacuated . There was great chaos in the building with occupants breaking windows to get air and filling the stairwells with a panic stricken mass of fleeing people. This attack was the work of a handful of amateur Muslims who were soon apprehended and tried. Four of them, Nidal Ayvad, Mohammed Salameh, Amad Ajaj and Mahmud Aboulhalma were tried and convicted of this act and in May of 1994 were sent to prison for life. Their putative leader, one Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, a New York area religious leader, was also sentenced to life for his controlling role in the attack.

The issues of this bomb attack were quite simple. Muslim fundamentalists had tried to destroy a major American financial institution. That they were amateurs and very inept was beside the point. Other, better organized and funded groups would note the disruption and panic and use it for future such attempts.

The Americans are not anywhere as competent in dealing with terrorists as we are. We have been intimately involved with them since before 1948. As usual, the American media made a large production of it for about a week and then it simply vanished.

The attitude of the Clinton administration was that they did not want to disturb the American Muslim population and in the end, viewed the attack as an aberration that was unlikely to be repeated. The terrorists were viewed as a group of rank amateurs and the matter was not pursued. We have good rapport with the Central Intelligence Agency and have many of our people employed there but this is a domestic matter and these internal matters are addressed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation which is not as friendly with us as other agencies. They have been instructed to cooperate with our people on such things but are very sparing in this cooperation. In summation, the Americans did not learn from this attack and this will be dealt with later in this report.

· Muslim extremists in US

Because of very lax, almost incompetent, enforcement of American immigration laws, many Muslim terrorists go to America to conduct their plotting, secure in the knowledge that unless they commit a crime, no one in authority will bother with them. They are free to enter, overstay their short-term visas and go to ground without fear of detection. Because many of these individuals and groups are a distinct threat to us, we have sought and obtained permission from the American authorities to send our counter intelligence people into their country and keep these potential terrorists under close surveillance.

Part of the agreement permitting this is that we were to keep the FBI fully appraised of anything we might find. They also agreed to supply us with information. This was rarely fully forthcoming so we set up our own surveillance, using telephonic systems we controlled. Also, we have been able to track bank records without any difficulty and can immediately locate funds coming into the United States from suspect foreign banks, known to act as conduits for terrorist funding. Because the FBI is often not particularly responsive or cooperative, we, in turn, only inform them of matters of common interest when absolutely necessary.

· Mossad Observations

Due to our investigations, we early on learned that known Muslim terrorists and suspected terror cells were primarily located in Phoenix, Arizona, as well as in both the Miami and Hollywood, Florida areas and once this had been ascertained, these groups were kept under close local surveillance from December 2000 to April 2001. The terrorists were watched daily and all telephone usage was closely observed. They often used codes when talking both inside the United States and overseas but these were fairly easily broken.

· Specific Activities of Mossad in US against terrorists

We were aware that several terrorist cells were operating in Germany, thanks to cooperation with the German BND and another agency. In 1996 and 1997, we were watching a number of suspected terrorists, specifically one Mohammed Atta and his lieutenant, Marwan al=Shehi were located at 54 Maarienstrasse in Hamburg We learned from telephone intercepts and one of our undercover people, a Yemeni , that the Muslims were planning to attack American naval units ported in Yemen. This was the attack on the USS Cole on October 12, 2000.

Our informant said that the Hamburg people were talking about the idea of launching a “massive and impressive” attack on American territory that would be planned to achieve the maximum public relations effect. In 2000, we learned that Atta and others had left Germany for the United States and that they were specifically preparing to launch a spectacular terrorist attack somewhere inside the United States. We had notified the FBI headquarters about this and then learned from them that Atta and others were now resident in Hollywood, Florida.

We sent a team of Arab-speakers led by Hanan Serfati, into the area and they were able to lease apartments had rented several dwellings near the corner of 701st St. and 21st St. in Hollywood, in direct proximity to the terrorist cell. Initially, we kept them under constant surveillance and when they had left their residence, conducted a break-in and planted listening devices. Also, one of our people, speaking perfect Arabic, made personal contact with the Atta people. The team leader himself kept a residence in proximity to the American Postal Service office where it had been determined that they had a drop box. At this point, we had kept both the FBI and the CIA fully informed of our actions and they, in turn, were able to help us with mail covers and other information. .

We observed that several of the terrorists began to take flight training. Mohammed Atta and Marwan Alshehhi took jet flying lessons at Huffman Aviation, a flight school in nearby Venice. Again, we notified the FBI and CIA of this training because it indicated a probable aerial assault but neither agency expressed any genuine interest in the information.

The Arab extremist plot that led to the attacks of September 11 was hatched in Hamburg, Germany.

The main movers in this plot, Mohammed Atta, Ramzi bin al Shibh and Said Bahaji, moved into an apartment at 54 Marienstrasse in the German port city. In 1999 these men, and others, went to an al Quaeda camp in Afghanistan for training purposes. In 2000, they were back in Hamburg, boasting about planned attacks against American targets. In the same year, a number of the Hamburg Arab plotters went to the United States to attend flight training schools.

From this time onwards, until the date of the actual attacks, the Hamburg terrorist cell was in constant telephonic and fax communication with their members in America.

Shortly before the attacks, most of the Hamburg terrorists left Germany for Afghanistan and Pakistan. [Source: New York Times, August 30, 2002]

· The Actual Terrorist Plan revealed

Our undercover agent with the Atta group had proven to be of great value to them by giving them information we supplied him. As they grew more confident of him, they confided to him, and we had made tapes of these conversations, that they planned to launch a massive aerial attack against targets inside the United States. The USS Cole incident, they felt, had had very little impact on the American public. It was then that an enlargement of the 1993 car bomb attack on the World Trade Center in New York was put forward They developed the idea that if they crashed their planes into both buildings, the results would be far more dramatic than the initial attack. Later, our man also suggested a possible attack on other targets in Washington. They discussed attacks on the White House, the Capitol building and the Pentagon.

The number of terrorists available to fly commercial planes into targets was limited by the number of men who were available and could be trained. It was then decided to rule out the White House because it was such a small target and concentrate on the Pentagon and the Capitol building. Once that had been settled, the actual planning began in earnest. Our man kept us advised at all times of the progress and we, in turn, immediately notified the Israeli Embassy in Washington and our own agency, both in Tel Aviv and the United States.

· Reports to Department of Justice (FBI) and CIA to White House in re coming attacks: The President notified.

As it appeared that there would be such attacks for a certainty., our Embassy first of all contacted both the American Justice Department and the Central Intelligence Agency and appraised them of the seriousness of the situation. Eventually, the office of the Ambassador made contact with top aides of the Vice President Cheney.

It was felt at the time that Mr. Cheney would understand this matter and be able to make a presentation to the President. In a number of substantive talks with Mr. Cheney, it was mutually decided that the attacks should proceed. The reasons agreed upon were that it would at once give the President the opportunity of securing great domestic power with the legislature and the public. It would also permit, and most important, that the U.S. could attack Saddam Hussein. He was then one of our top enemies and had, in fact, bombarded us with missiles during the Gulf War.

It was felt strongly that if Hussein were removed, the country invaded by American troops and occupied, not only would the United States have secure rights to the huge Iraqi oil reserves but could set up a large, permanent military base in Iraq. This would act as a buffer for Israel and a constant threat to other Arab states plus set up a vital block between Iran, who has threatened Israel many times, and our state. Mr. Cheney, who has excellent connections with the American oil business, was entirely in favor of this on both counts.

He then made a presentation, with our people present, to the President who at once accepted all the aspects of it. The decision was made not to interdict the attack in any way and allow it to happen as it would and to await the outcome. Both the CIA and FBI were to be listened to but forbidden to act “until informed to do so.”

Mr. Cheney remarked that he did not want an attack on the Pentagon to emasculate its military leadership so he suggested that since a part of the building was empty due to interior renovations, that our man with the Atta group inform them that this empty side was where the important people worked.

When the subject of the air attack on the Capitol building, an enormous and easily hit target, the President remarked that if the Congress was sitting at the time of the attack, the death or injury of many of its members would not only add to national outrage but also strengthen his powers as a President during a wartime. There was at this point in time, no doubt that a subsequent American military attack on Iraq with ground troops would be made as discussed above.

· Influx of Foreign Intelligence Warnings

Since well before the target date, a number of high-level warnings were received by American governmental agencies concerning news of a pending terrorist attack. Because, at the highest level, it was wished not to interfere with the probability of such an attack, all such information was sent to either the Vice President or the President himself. Of course, nothing was done in fact but there were many worried conversations back and forth. The most persistent were the Germans who had developed inside information and on a number of occasions sent their finding on to the Americans. All were ignored.

In mid-August, 2001, President Vladimir Putin of Russia made a report about possible Arab attacks against domestic American targets..

On August 20, 2001, the French government made a similar report.

On August 24, 2001, the head of the Israeli Mossad reported the imminence of an Arab attack against American targets and a similar report was made by the same agency on September 7, 2001.

Domestically, the picture is not as clear but it is known that:

On June 26, 2001, the CIA informed the White House that they had intercepted foreign intelligence traffic concerning possible al-Qaeda strikes in America on July 4.

On July 1, 2001, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-California) a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee stated that her staff had advised her that there was a “major probability of a terrorist incident within the next three months.” (emphasis added)

On July 2, 2001, the FBI reported to the White House that al-Qaeda terrorist attacks outside the United States were very possible and that domestic attacks could not be discounted.

On July 5, 2001, the CIA informed the President that al-Qaeda attacks against American targets were entirely possible during the summer of that year.

On July 28, 2001, authorities in Dubai arrested one Djamel Beghal who revealed information about a planned al-Qaeda explosive attack on the U.S. Embassy in Paris

On August 6, 2001, the CIA also presented a warning to the President, explicitly concerned with terrorism inside the United States. The actual content of this message has been the subject of considerable debate, with White House officials understandably downplaying its significance.[Sources: Time May 27, 2002]

· Mossad agrees to provide special services to US in addition to updates on Atta people

After many discussions, it was determined that the American authorities could not be seen to have had real knowledge and specific information on this attack. It was also reasoned that for the attack to achieve its geo-political goals, the targets would have to be destroyed. Of course they could not destroy the Pentagon nor would this be wished. As stated above, the damage was to be in a so-called “safe” area. Our man in Florida did give to the Atta people his ‘inside” information as to which part of the building to attack and thereby save the lives of top military officials. Because the main public relations targets were the two tall buildings, it was imperative that they be either badly damaged or destroyed in full view of the cameras and the American public. Heavy loss of life was expected but mention was made of an air accident previously in which an American bomber got lost in the clouds and rammed into the Empire State building. Damage to the building was not great. It was finally agreed that we would supply certain technical assistance to absolutely insure the very visual and dramatic damage.

The Americans would have no provable connection with this. To achieve this, first a study of both buildings was made that showed they were very cheaply erected and that it would be very possible to “assist” the terrorists in their work. To do this, three teams of our people were selected with the idea that they would leave the country right away and that no one would attempt to interdict or block their exit.

The actual plan was to enter the big buildings at night as maintenance people, to proceed to the part of the buildings most likely to be struck. We knew approximately where this would happen but not certainly. Then, entering the office spaces, qjuick access through the false ceilings allowed the team to use locally-made thermite bombs with magnetic attachments which would easily and quickly be placed against a strategic number of the horizontal steel beams that held up each floor.

They were to be triggered by a specific rise in heat and were placed against each bean at an angle so as to insure burring the beam through sufficiently to materially weaken it. Our engineers calculated that first the plane would strike the building and start big fires. The fires would weaken the beams and when the heat had reached a certain point, the thermite hidden up above the false ceilings would ignite and burn through the beam. The weight of the building above would press down below and it was then hoped that everything would crash down.

As we did not know just on what floor the plane would strike, these heat bombs were placed, five to a floor, for five floors, up and down. These bombs were small enough, and safe enough, to conceal in maintenance equipment. And, in the event that the attacks were aborted for any reason, our people could easily return to the buildings afterwards and retrieve the bombs without leaving a trace. The thermite would certainly eat into the steel but would not explode and reveal its presence.

· The attack

About three weeks prior to the actual attack, the special code words were developed by Atta. In that case, the Pentagon was called ‘The Faculty of Fine Arts”, the Capitol was termed “The Faculity of Law;” and the Trade Building tower was termed, as "The Faculty of Town Planning." This, of course was part of the cover story that Atta and his people were students, following an educational career in America and used these for international telephone calls to their superiors in Saudi Arabia.

As soon as the date was fixed for the attack, the White House warned very senior American officials like the Attorney General and the Secretary of Defense and his staff, not to fly on commercial aircraft because of “rumors of possible hijackings” . No one outside of a very small circle was told the truth. And because of the possibility that the White House might still be a target of opportunity, the President went in early October, well before the projected attack date, to Texas and then later went to Florida where he and his staff remained in safety until after the attack was over.

July 26, 2001: Attorney General Ashcroft stops flying commercial airlines due to a threat assessment but “neither the FBI nor the Justice Department … would identify [to CBS] what the threat was, when it was detected or who made it.”. [Source: CBS, 7/26/01] He later walks out of his office rather than answer questions about this. [Source: Associated Press, 5/16/02]

August 4-30, 2001: President Bush spends most of August 2001 at his Crawford, Texas, ranch, nearly setting a record for the longest presidential vacation. While it is billed a “working vacation,” ABC reports Bush is doing “nothing much” aside from his regular daily intelligence briefings. [ABC 8/3/01; Washington Post 8/7/01; Salon 8/29/01] One such unusually long briefing at the start of his trip is a warning that bin Laden is planning to attack in the US, but Bush spends the rest of that day fishing (see August 6, 2001). By the end of his trip, Bush has spent 42 percent of his presidency at vacation spots or en route. [Washington Post 8/7/01] At the time, a poll shows that 55 percent of Americans say Bush is taking too much time off. [USA Today, 8/7/01] Vice President Cheney also spends the entire month in a remote location in Wyoming. [Jackson Hole News and Guide 8/15/01]

September 6-7, 2001: 4,744 put options (a speculation that the stock will go down) are purchased on United Air Lines stock as opposed to only 396 call options (speculation that the stock will go up). This is a dramatic and abnormal increase in sales of put options. Many of the UAL puts are purchased through Deutschebank/AB Brown, a firm managed until 1998 by the current Executive Director of the CIA, A.B. "Buzzy" Krongard. [New York Times; Wall Street Journal]

September 10, 2001: 4,516 put options are purchased on American Airlines as compared to 748 call options. [New York Times; Wall Street Journal.]

September 6-11, 2001: No other airlines show any similar trading patterns to those experienced by UAL and American. The put option purchases on both airlines were 600% above normal. This at a time when Reuters (September 10) issues a business report stating "airline stocks may be poised to take off."

September 6-10, 2001: Highly abnormal levels of put options are purchased in Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, AXA Re (insurance) which owns 25% of American Airlines, and Munich Re. All of these companies are directly impacted by the September 11 attacks.

On September 10, 2001, the NSA intercepted two messages in Arabic. One message read:

“Tomorrow is zero hour” and the second “The match begins tomorrow.” [Source: New York Times, August 10, 2002] On June 19, 2002, CNN reported the contents of these two National Security Agency intercepts. Other news outlets, including The Washington Post, also reported on the intercepts. [Source: New York Times, August 10, 2002]

September 10, 2001: Bush flew to Florida from Texas to visit with his brother Governor Jeb Bush. Attorney General Ashcroft rejects a proposed $58 million increase in financing for the bureau's counter-terrorism programs. On the same day, he sends a request for budget increases to the White House. It covers 68 programs, but none of them relate to counter-terrorism. He also sends a memorandum to his heads of departments, stating his seven priorities—none of them relating to counter-terrorism. This is more than a little strange, since Ashcroft stopped flying public airplanes in July due to terrorist threats (see July 26, 2001) and he told a Senate committee in May that counter-terrorism was his “highest priority.” [New York Times, 6/1/02, Guardian, 5/21/02]

· Final Observations

The final attack varied very little from the last planning stage. One of the hijacked planes, the one intended to hit the Capitol building, was crashed by action of its passengers but the other three struck their targets as anticipated. The flames, smoke and general confusion were indeed a public spectacle, seen by all of America and the buildings, beams severed when the heat reached a certain point, did collapse in great clouds. A third building was tended to from the inside, not struck by an aircraft, and because great tanks of fuel were ignited, burned until it collapsed some time later.

The carnage was not to believe and everyone involved in this felt is was a most profitable operation. As we know, the President was acclaimed as a great leader and he was then able to marshal national support into his attack on Iraq. The military campaign, as foreseen, has proven to be quick and decisive, Hussein and his henchmen were swept away and now the American military and civilian forces are in complete control of Iraq. Iran has been put on notice and we expect a large, permanent American military base in the area to act as a deterrent to any future manifestation of Arab nationalism. All of our technicians, as opposed to our intelligence people, were immediately evacuated and aside from several who were temporarily detained by American authorities, eventually all were released and returned safe home.

Now, we have moved from a defensive to an offensive posture and, with American support and a large military presence, the ever-present fears of attacks have been neutralized, hopefully for a very long time.”

Thursday, October 18, 2007

Politically Independent

You know, the trouble with being politically independent like I am is that I get lumped into the same category as these people. They are CRAZY! From what I can see, they are effectively the modern version of the Nazi Party (the real one, not the bunch of hicks running around with swastikas and jackboots on claiming to be Nazi's) with the notable exception being that they use Muslims as the scapegoat instead of Jews and they do not appear to be bent on world conquest. Then again, the original Nazi Party didn't really start out expressing that they wanted the world, did they?


Did He Really Just Say What I Think He Said?

Heard during a White House Press conference on the morning of October 17th, 2007:

Reporter: Mr. President, following up on Vladimir Putin for a moment, he said recently that next year, when he has to step down according to the constitution, as the president, he may become prime minister; in effect keeping power and dashing any hopes for a genuine democratic transition there ...

Bush: I've been planning that myself.”

That is all.

Suspension of Logic

News has recently come to light that Congressman Ron Paul currently garners the most money (among Republicans) in donations to his Presidential campaign among members of the United States military. If you don’t care to read the entire article I just linked to, just press “CTRL+ F” and type in “active members of the military”. That will show you what I am talking about. I would prefer that you read the entire article, but I cannot and will not coerce you into it. It’s a free country, right?

So, the point of this blog writing is to state that Fox News has accomplished what I would consider to be a complete suspension of logical thought. During the October 17th broadcast of their morning show “Fox & Friends”, they actually asked Congressman Paul why the military supported him so much when he constantly advocated their withdrawal from Iraq. Are they functionally retarded? Why would the members of the military NOT support Ron Paul, who advocated that they immediately return home to safety? Why would the members of the military NOT support Ron Paul, who advocates going to war only when necessary and only when declared? The way I see it, not wanting to go to war without a damn good and provable reason is the ultimate way of supporting the troops. They volunteer to fight for those Americans who cannot or will not fight for themselves and all they ask in return is to be treated fairly and sent into harm’s way only when absolutely necessary.

I could see how members of the highest echelons of the chains of command would not support Ron Paul. However, these are not the men and women who are on the ground actually fighting this war. They are not being shot at, losing limbs, being blinded, being poisoned by depleted uranium munitions’ radiation, missing their children growing up, living in constant fear that the next person that they save may be the one with a bomb strapped to their chest under their shirt or that the next trip they take across town may just be their last. No, they’re sitting in their nice, air-conditioned office back at the Pentagon or in the confines of the relatively safe Green Zone of Baghdad, waiting on the day that they can retire and go to work for one of the contractors that they serve making millions of dollars in salary and stock options. They do not actually want the war to end because, for them, it is an investment in their own financial future. It’s literally a case of money over substance of character. These people do not care at all about the well-being of anyone or anything outside of their own bank account. It’s a free-for-all. Well, not free for ALL. Maybe a more accurate term would be “free-for-some”.

Sorry, I skewed a bit there. I can’t help it. It makes me angry. I would like to think that this sort of thing makes enough people angry to actually change this, but I am a realist and I know that all I can do is to put these things out there and hope that someone is listening.

Back to the point. There is a very simple and logical reason why so many members of the United States Armed Forces would support Ron Paul. It is simply because he supports going back to the drawing board (the Constitution) and making right what has been made so wrong. If a ship is lost because its captain won’t look at a map; someone has to relieve the captain of duty, get out the map and steer the ship back on course. The United States is that ship and the US Constitution is that map. All members of the US Armed Forces take an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution upon enlistment. Here it is:

I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.”

Note that it also states that the enlistee swears to obey the orders of the President and the officers over him/her. It also says that this is to be done according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. This is the important part. The United States Constitution dictates that the US President cannot enter a war without a declaration of war by Congress. Did the current President get the approval of Congress to go to war in Iraq? Yes, he did. However, he did so by deception. This has been proven. Also, no declaration was ever made. Now, it is simply a matter of how to withdraw. Nevertheless, a soldier/Marine/sailor/airman is only required to obey lawful orders as defined by the UCMJ. The UCMJ does not override Federal law. Federal law is derived from the US Constitution and the Constitution states that we are required to recognize all treaties that we enter into. The invasion of Iraq as authorized by Congress is a direct violation of international law under Principle 6 of the Nuremberg Principles as defined by UN General Assembly Resolution 177. As far as I can tell, this is a war crime. Under this same set or rules, George W. Bush is guilty of war crimes under Principle 3 and likely more than half of our current government and a large number of people in the mass media are guilty under Principle 8. Pay particular attention to Principle 6, though. That is the one that bothers me most. I’ll go ahead and post it here, that way you don’t have to do the work:

Principle VI

The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law:

(a) Crimes against peace:
(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).

(b) War crimes:
Violations of the laws or customs of war include, but are not limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation to slave-labour or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory, murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war, of persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.

(c) Crimes against humanity:
Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhuman acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime.

Okay class… how many of the above listed items have the United States violated over the last 4 years with regards to Iraq? I can name at least 9. How about you? The point of it is that Ron Paul wishes to follow the Constitution in all matters, including matters of war, which affects the military directly since they are the ones who fight it. If we followed the Supreme Law of the Land (the Constitution) with regards to the Iraq war, then 3,829 American troops might just still be with us and MANY more might just still have all of the body parts and functions they were born with.

The things that I just said may give certain Ann Coulter/Bill O’Reilly/Sean Hannity types reason to label me a traitor or an America-hater. I assure you, the opposite is true. I absolutely LOVE my country. I would happily and readily lay down my own life for it if I knew that doing so would preserve its future, its dignity and its integrity. It is for this reason that I say the things that I say. Criticism is necessary in order to improve. Dissent is vital to the blood of a nation. Without dissent, how would anyone know that their liberties were being squashed, their rights trampled or their very existence threatened? Dissent is patriotic.