Tuesday, December 18, 2007

I Didn’t Screw Her and That Kid’s Not Mine, I Swear It!

I am livid. Simply livid.

As you all know, I started therapy a few weeks ago. Already, I have had to miss one appointment because of my job and the incompetence of my co-worker. Now, I have to miss another one. Not only that, but I also have to work out the entire remainder of the week and Christmas Eve with no help at all because of this same co-worker.

Let me begin by stating some facts about this person. He is a 59-year-old man who has a 45-year-old wife. This wife has 7 children, 4 of which are under the age of 18. He (we’ll call him “Joe”) and his wife (we’ll call her “tits on a boar hog” as in useless) have been married for 4 years now and he has been with the company I work for (which shall remain nameless) for a little over 1 year. During the course of this past year, his wife has quit two jobs and been fired from one, which was her most recent. She was terminated for excessive absenteeism. This is a result of having so many kids. Well, it’s actually because she is one of those people that feels like she should stay at home any time one of her children has the sniffles. With 6 (tits on a boar hog, Joe and their 4 short, retarded people who refuse to pay rent) people living in a 3 bedroom house, the sniffles never really go away. Within the span of 90 days, this woman missed 15 days! You read that right, 15 days! That adds up to 3 days for each child and 3 for herself. Granted, she has some female health problems, but she didn’t take all of those days off for herself.

This would have no bearing on me, except that Joe takes time off from work so that he can “take care of her”. Goddamn you fucking piece of shit, she 45 goddamned years old! Has she not figured out how to take care of herself after this much time?!?!? It’s not my fault that she used her vulva as if it were a Pez dispenser! Typically, after the first couple of kids you figure out what causes that condition and you take precautions. But not this silly twat. No, she expects everyone else to take up her slack and to make special arrangements for her as if she were somehow handicapped. She actually complained about her new employer firing her with a tone of righteous indignation. Sorry you fucking idiot, I should not have to work myself into an early grave because you were too stupid to say no or use a fucking condom and your new husband is silly enough to marry your immature and selfish ass. Your employer should not have to grant you more time off simply because you didn’t have sense enough to close your legs. It’s not my fault that every time you have a sore vagina that you have to stay at home and your husband of the old balls has to take care of you like you were his child instead of his wife. Maybe, just maybe, if you didn’t spend so much time using your uterus like it was a fetal storage unit your pussy wouldn’t hurt so badly! Did you ever think of that? Her youngest child is 11 and her oldest is 21. That means she spent about 10 years of her life pregnant or recovering from pregnancy. I’m starting to think that she was the role model for the Cabbage Patch Kids factory. When kids’ parents told the story of babies being found underneath a cabbage leaf, the cabbage leaf was just a euphemism for this woman.

Don’t get me wrong, I totally get the idea of wanting to take care of your wife when she’s sick or injured. However, at some point enough has to be enough. If my wife were seriously ill and needed my help, you can bet your ass that I would do everything I could to take care of her and provide for her. What I wouldn’t do, however, is expect that everyone else is going to make unnecessary sacrifices so that I may do so or that I will be granted special privileges from my employer. The world just doesn’t work that way. What makes this situation worse is that Joe ran out of paid time off about 3 months ago and is now being granted a week’s time off with pay right before Christmas. When we scheduled our vacation times earlier this year, I was told I could not have time off at Christmas because I did not have the seniority to do it and that I would have to wait my turn. Joe was hired at the same pay rate that I was and was granted more PTO than I receive and was hired a year after me. Now he is getting a paid week off simply because his wife’s pussy is falling out and she needs a hysterectomy (typically an outpatient procedure, mind you) right before the holidays. Now that I think about it, his wife also had a “procedure” scheduled right before Thanksgiving as well. Seems mighty coincidental, eh? Fuck it. What can I do?

Oh, and did I mention that I was livid?

**My apologies if the preceding rant offended anyone. It was not meant to be sexist in any way.

Monday, December 17, 2007

Merry Christmas!

I’ve been sitting back and watching a handful of situations as of late. Watching these situations has led me to ask a few questions.

The first thing that I observed is that Americans spent a total of $20 BILLION dollars in one day on the day after Thanksgiving. This actually leads me to several questions. Why do we need to spend that much money over the course of one 24-hour period? Why couldn’t we be satisfied with spending only $10 billion and either giving the other $10 billion to charity or just saving it for retirement? If we can afford to spend that kind of money in one day on what amounts to future land fill, then why are so many people in foreclosure on their homes and why are there so many people filing for bankruptcy?

Another thing I have noticed is that people are donating their hard-earned dollars to political campaigns. This is not a bad thing in and of itself. But let’s look at the amount of money being donated and spent during the campaigns for President in 2008. According to OpenSecrets.org, the combined total spent (for the third quarter) on the Democrat side of the campaign is $133,516,245 with cash on hand in the amount of $110,888,289. On the Republican side of this, the total spent is $132,445,115 with cash on hand in the amount of $42,921,787. In terms of donations, the Democrats had a total of $244,404,140 and Republicans had $175,336,955; each of these figures spanning the entire length of the campaign by the end of the third quarter. This means that American corporations and people donated a total of $419,741,095 to Presidential campaigns. I think that this is funny considering that, much like the Highlander, there can be only one. The race for the Presidency has effectively turned into a gigantic horse race, with corporations representing the hardcore gambling junkie. I think that it’s kind of sickening to know that Americans have this kind of money to just effectively throw away, yet there are still homeless people here. It’s sickening to think that we have this kind of disposable money, yet the education system is falling apart. It’s sickening to think that we have all of this disposable money floating around, yet we cannot work on an alternative fuel source in order reduce our dependency on foreign oil. It makes no sense to me.

Let’s focus on the homeless problem for the moment. It was estimated that there were approximately 750,000 homeless people in the United States this year. If we (as in American people and corporations) were to reduce the amount that we donated (according to the stats I quoted previously) to political campaigns by 50% and committed this amount to the cause of eradicating homelessness, we would have $209,870,547.50 going toward this cause. This only amounts to $279 per person, but it’s better than nothing, which is what you get when you donate to a losing political campaign. Let’s add the amounts that I spoke of in the beginning of this blog, which is how much was spent in one day of holiday shopping. The amount was $20 billion. Reduce it by 50% and split that total among 750,000 people and you get more than $13,000 per person. That’s a pretty significant amount. If 4 of those people are a family, that’s $52,000, which is more than enough to pay the rent on an apartment for a year. Hell, that’s probably enough to pay their grocery bill and most of their bills for basic living expenses altogether for a year. How many families do you know who live on less than that right now? Thinking about it, every family I know right now lives on less than that. I’m one of them. I’ve lived on less than that my entire life.

I think that the major problem with we Americans is that we try too hard to live the “American Dream”. This dream is great, but not when it comes at the expense of other people. We are so busy trying to be this new and bastardized version of what we think an American is supposed to be that we have forgotten that we are human first. I think that we need to drop the superiority complex and adopt an equality complex. Sorry, but your kid doesn’t have a need for a $500 gaming system when the kid down the street doesn’t have enough food to eat even though their parents are doing everything they can. Your kid doesn’t need new $100 Nike sneakers when the soles of the shoes on the kid down the street are being held in place by duct tape and Shoe Goo and are 2 sizes too small. Your kid doesn’t need a $200 Starter jacket when the kid down the street doesn’t even have heat in his house. Think about these things. So many people spend so much time worrying about what kind of gift they are going to buy their loved one for the holidays. They never stop to think that they are giving out gifts to people on a day that is not their birthday. The real gift is reflection on your life and recognizing just how fortunate you really are to be alive, healthy and surrounded by people who care about you.

Oh, and if you are one of those assholes that gets pissed off when a person says “Merry Christmas” when you are not a person who celebrates Christmas… FUCK YOU, you FUCKING DICKHEAD! You should be glad that they didn’t just spit in your face, kick you in the crotch, punch you in the throat and steal your wallet. If I say Merry Christmas and you get indignant about it, you’re likely to get all of the above from me, minus the stealing of your wallet just because I’m not a thief.

Wednesday, December 5, 2007

Dead Relatives as Jewelry?

This is kind of weird. Creepy almost. I suppose it’s better than some kid from Sierra Leone losing an arm in a diamond mine so you can put some useless rock onto the hand of your equally useless wife-to-be. I say she’s useless because, by expecting a diamond for an engagement ring, she is actually determining how much you love her by how much you are willing to spend on a piece of jewelry. If they were quality people, they would just say something like: “Why not just go spend the 3 months’ salary you were going to spend on a ring and put it in an I.R.A. for our future?” They might even say: “save that 3 months’ salary for a nursery for our baby or a savings account for our children’s college tuition?” But no, they have to have a rock. Who are these silly people, Wilma Flintstone wannabees? Do we all live in Bedrock all of a sudden? Forgive me if I’m mistaken, but I thought we’d progressed beyond the need as a species for pointless and vanity-laden decoration.

The same goes for all of these rappers and their “bling”. They’re even more useless than these goofy people who need a diamond as an affirmation of love. They’re more useless because there isn’t even any historical precedent for what they do. It’s nothing but a status symbol. Why do they need a ring that covers the entire top of their hand and spells out their rapper name? Why do they need a Rolex watch covered in diamonds when a Timex will do? Why do they need a 1-inch-thick platinum chain that is 3 feet long with a diamond-encrusted 9 MM as a pendant? Why not just buy the same thing in cubic Zirconium? It looks the same but costs a tenth of the price. Take the other nine-tenths and put it into a money-market account for Christ’s sake! Lord knows your fame and fortune isn't going to last.

Thursday, November 29, 2007

We Speak English Here, Do You?

Speak English, Nancy: Pelosi stiffs the Salvation Army

Tuesday, Nov. 20, 2007

WHEN SHOULD it be illegal for a boss to require that employees speak English? If radical members of the U.S. House have their way, the answer will be almost always, if not always.

After the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued the Salvation Army for firing two Hispanic employees in Framingham, Mass., earlier this year, the question has become a hot political topic.

The Salvation Army, which has an English-only policy, had given the women, and all employees, a year to learn English. The two, whose job was to sort clothes, refused. They were fired.

The EEOC called this discrimination. But that's nonsense.

According to the EEOC, businesses can adopt English-only policies only in certain circumstances, such as when employees directly interact with the public or for safety reasons.

That means that employers cannot insist that all employees speak the same language the boss, the police, firefighters and customers speak. This is absurd.

Unfortunately, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi doesn't think so. Caving to the demands of radical Hispanic members of her own party, she is refusing to bring to a vote a Senate-passed provision relaxing federal rules on employer English-only policies.

That provision, sponsored by Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., passed in the Senate 75-19. But Speaker Pelosi is going to kill it to please extremists Hispanics in the Democratic Party.

The federal government must not be able to force businesses to employ people who can't or won't speak English. That's just common sense. But common sense doesn't seem to be understood in Nancy Pelosi's office. Maybe if someone explained it to her in Spanish, she'd get it.

 

MY COMMENTARY

On the surface, I would say that this is probably discrimination on the part of the Salvation Army. However, is it really? Is it unreasonable to expect an employee who works for you to be able to speak the same language as you or as the majority of the other employees who work for you? Better yet, is it reasonable for the government to force you as an employer to have to learn another language or to make arrangements over and above a paycheck and benefits for someone who is not disabled in some way?

Another question I have is this: what makes anyone think that this will only apply to Hispanics? What about people who speak Mandarin Chinese? What about the Vietnamese? What about people who speak Arabic, Farsi, Persian, Hebrew, Russian, Greek, French, Japanese, Italian, German, Polish, Yiddish, Swahili or whatever other language anyone wants to speak? Where is their protection? See, that seems to be a major problem. How do we protect the rights of one group of people without infringing on the rights of another group? I'm not saying that the Salvation Army is not discriminating. I don't know that because I don't know their policy. What I am saying is that I believe that, if their policy dictates that their employees speak English while on the job, that they are within their rights as a business to make that rule. Another thing that I am saying is that Nancy Pelosi is one of the weakest politicians that I have ever heard of.

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

"You have failed us miserably and we won't take it any more."

Address by Mayor Ross C. "Rocky" Anderson
Today, as we come together once again in this great city, we raise our voices in unison to say to President Bush, to Vice President Cheney, to other members of the Bush Administration (past and present), to a majority of Congress, including Utah's entire congressional delegation, and to much of the mainstream media: "You have failed us miserably and we won't take it any more."


"While we had every reason to expect far more of you, you have been pompous, greedy, cruel, and incompetent as you have led this great nation to a moral, military, and national security abyss."


"You have breached trust with the American people in the most egregious ways. You have utterly failed in the performance of your jobs. You have undermined our Constitution, permitted the violation of the most fundamental treaty obligations, and betrayed the rule of law."


"You have engaged in, or permitted, heinous human rights abuses of the sort never before countenanced in our nation's history as a matter of official policy. You have sent American men and women to kill and be killed on the basis of lies, on the basis of shifting justifications, without competent leadership, and without even a coherent plan for this monumental blunder."

"We are here to tell you: We won't take it any more!"

"You have acted in direct contravention of values that we, as Americans who love our country, hold dear. You have deceived us in the most cynical, outrageous ways. You have undermined, or allowed the undermining of, our constitutional system of checks and balances among the three presumed co-equal branches of government. You have helped lead our nation to the brink of fascism, of a dictatorship contemptuous of our nation's treaty obligations, federal statutory law, our Constitution, and the rule of law."

"Because of you, and because of your jingoistic false 'patriotism,' our world is far more dangerous, our nation is far more despised, and the threat of terrorism is far greater than ever before.
It has been absolutely astounding how you have committed the most horrendous acts, causing such needless tragedy in the lives of millions of people, yet you wear your so-called religion on your sleeves, asserting your God-is-on-my-side nonsense – when what you have done flies in the face of any religious or humanitarian tradition. Your hypocrisy is mind-boggling – and disgraceful. What part of "Thou shalt not kill" do you not understand? What part of the "Golden rule" do you not understand? What part of "be honest," "be responsible," and "be accountable" don't you understand? What part of "Blessed are the peacekeepers" do you not understand?

Because of you, hundreds of thousands of people have been killed, many thousands of people have suffered horrendous lifetime injuries, and millions have been run off from their homes. For the sake of our nation, for the sake of our children, and for the sake of our brothers and sisters around the world, we are morally compelled to say, as loudly as we can, 'We won't take it any more!' "

"As United States agents kidnap, disappear, and torture human beings around the world, you justify, you deceive, and you cover up. We find what you have done to men, women and children, and to the good name and reputation of the United States, so appalling, so unconscionable, and so outrageous as to compel us to call upon you to step aside and allow other men and women who are competent, true to our nation's values, and with high moral principles to stand in your places – for the good of our nation, for the good of our children, and for the good of our world."

In the case of the President and Vice President, this means impeachment and removal from office, without any further delay from a complacent, complicit Congress, the Democratic majority of which cares more about political gain in 2008 than it does about the vindication of our Constitution, the rule of law, and democratic accountability.

It means the election of people as President and Vice President who, unlike most of the presidential candidates from both major parties, have not aided and abetted in the perpetration of the illegal, tragic, devastating invasion and occupation of Iraq. And it means the election of people as President and Vice President who will commit to return our nation to the moral and strategic imperative of refraining from torturing human beings.

In the case of the majority of Congress, it means electing people who are diligent enough to learn the facts, including reading available National Intelligence Estimates, before voting to go to war. It means electing to Congress men and women who will jealously guard Congress's sole prerogative to declare war. It means electing to Congress men and women who will not submit like vapid lap dogs to presidential requests for blank checks to engage in so-called preemptive wars, for legislation permitting warrantless wiretapping of communications involving US citizens, and for dangerous, irresponsible, saber-rattling legislation like the recent Kyl-Lieberman amendment.
We must avoid the trap of focusing the blame solely upon President Bush and Vice-President Cheney. This is not just about a few people who have wronged our country – and the world.

They were enabled by members of both parties in Congress, they were enabled by the pathetic mainstream news media, and, ultimately, they have been enabled by the American people – 40% of whom are so ill-informed they still think Iraq was behind the 9/11 attacks – a people who know and care more about baseball statistics and which drunken starlets are wearing underwear than they know and care about the atrocities being committed every single day in our name by a government for which we need to take responsibility.

As loyal Americans, without regard to political partisanship -- as veterans, as teachers, as religious leaders, as working men and women, as students, as professionals, as businesspeople, as public servants, as retirees, as people of all ages, races, ethnic origins, sexual orientations, and faiths -- we are here to say to the Bush administration, to the majority of Congress, and to the mainstream media: "You have violated your solemn responsibilities. You have undermined our democracy, spat upon our Constitution, and engaged in outrageous, despicable acts. You have brought our nation to a point of immorality, inhumanity, and illegality of immense, tragic, unprecedented proportions."

"But we will live up to our responsibilities as citizens, as brothers and sisters of those who have suffered as a result of the imperial bullying of the United States government, and as moral actors who must take a stand: And we will, and must, mean it when we say 'We won't take it any more.'"

If we want principled, courageous elected officials, we need to be principled, courageous, and tenacious ourselves. History has demonstrated that our elected officials are not the leaders – the leadership has to come from us. If we don't insist, if we don't persist, then we are not living up to our responsibilities as citizens in a democracy – and our responsibilities as moral human beings.

If we remain silent, we signal to Congress and the Bush administration – and to candidates running for office – and to the world – that we support the status quo.
Silence is complicity. Only by standing up for what's right and never letting down can we say we are doing our part.
Our government, on the basis of a campaign we now know was entirely fraudulent, attacked and militarily occupied a nation that posed no danger to the United States. Our government, acting in our name, has caused immense, unjustified death and destruction.

It all started five years ago, yet where have we, the American people, been? At this point, we are responsible. We get together once in a while at demonstrations and complain about Bush and Cheney, about Congress, and about the pathetic news media. We point fingers and yell a lot. Then most people politely go away until another demonstration a few months later.

How many people can honestly say they have spent as much time learning about and opposing the outrages of the Bush administration as they have spent watching sports or mindless television programs during the past five years? Escapist, time-sapping sports and insipid entertainment have indeed become the opiate of the masses.

Why is this country so sound asleep? Why do we abide what is happening to our nation, to our Constitution, to the cause of peace and international law and order? Why are we not doing all in our power to put an end to this madness?
We should be in the streets regularly and students should be raising hell on our campuses. We should be making it clear in every way possible that apologies or convoluted, disingenuous explanations just don't cut it when presidential candidates and so many others voted to authorize George Bush and his neo-con buddies to send American men and women to attack and occupy Iraq.

Let's awaken, and wake up the country by committing here and now to do all each of us can to take our nation back. Let them hear us across the country, as we ask others to join us: "We won't take it any more!"

I implore you: Draw a line. Figure out exactly where your own moral breaking point is. How much will you put up with before you say "No more" and mean it?

I have drawn my line as a matter of simple personal morality: I cannot, and will not, support any candidate who has voted to fund the atrocities in Iraq. I cannot, and will not, support any candidate who will not commit to remove all US troops, as soon as possible, from Iraq. I cannot, and will not, support any candidate who has supported legislation that takes us one step closer to attacking Iran. I cannot, and will not, support any candidate who has not fought to stop the kidnapping, disappearances, and torture being carried on in our name.

If we expect our nation's elected officials to take us seriously, let us send a powerful message they cannot misunderstand. Let them know we really do have our moral breaking point. Let them know we have drawn a bright line. Let them know they cannot take our support for granted – that, regardless of their party and regardless of other political considerations, they will not have our support if they cannot provide, and have not provided, principled leadership.

The people of this nation may have been far too quiet for five years, but let us pledge that we won't let it go on one more day – that we will do all we can to put an end to the illegalities, the moral degradation, and the disintegration of our nation's reputation in the world.

Let us be unified in drawing the line – in declaring that we do have a moral breaking point. Let us insist, together, in supporting our troops and in gratitude for the freedoms for which our veterans gave so much, that we bring our troops home from Iraq, that we return our government to a constitutional democracy, and that we commit to honoring the fundamental principles of human rights.

In defense of our country, in defense of our Constitution, in defense of our shared values as Americans – and as moral human beings – we declare today that we will fight in every way possible to stop the insanity, stop the continued military occupation of Iraq, and stop the moral depravity reflected by the kidnapping, disappearing, and torture of people around the world.

SOURCE

Monday, November 5, 2007

Had to post this for posterity...

As has come to be expected by me, Keith Olbermann nails it!

Wednesday, October 31, 2007

My Letter to the Editor

Do you think that they will print this?


To Whom It May Concern (which is ALL of you):

What is it that you are all so afraid of? Is it death? If it is, I can guarantee you with 100% certainty that death is something that you cannot escape, no matter who or where it comes from.

Is it the death of a loved one? If so, I can guarantee you with 100% certainty that neither they, nor you, nor I can stop that either.

Is it terrorism? If so, I can guarantee you, although not 100%, that the government that you cowards have charged with coddling you cannot and, more importantly, will not protect you from. Just look at what happened at Virginia Tech. Where was your PATRIOT Act then?

There are only 4 absolute truths in human life. They are as follows: you must eat food, you must drink water, you must breathe air and you must die. That’s it. Nothing else in life is absolute. Nothing else in life is mandatory.

For me, however, there is one other thing that is necessary in my life. That necessity is freedom. That necessity is the liberty which was guaranteed to me by the United States Constitution, written by men much more intelligent and far wiser than I. That necessity is the freedom which is so bravely defended and upheld by men and women much more courageous than I. That necessity is the freedom which is the very life blood of the nation that we call home. That nation which was, at one time, a brightly shining beacon of hope and an example for all to follow. That nation which has been tarnished, as of late, by men and women who are hungry for power and drunken with greed. That nation which has been buried under massive quantities of incompetence and sociopathy. My necessity is the full restoration of my home and seeing her taking her rightful place at the forefront of the cause of freedom the world over. Not through empire-building. Not through force. Not at the barrel of a rifle or the exploding of a bomb dropped from the air or a missile fired from miles away. No. I want my country to spread freedom or, more accurately, the desire for freedom through example and by displays of even-handed compassion.

When are the rest of you cowards going to wake up and see that your desire for safety is costing you the very thing that you were born into? When are you going to wake up and tell your leaders that you will not sacrifice your freedoms for safety, not even for a second and not even temporarily, particularly when they are so inept at protecting you? When are you going to stop quaking in your shoes and hiding behind the skirts of your mothers and say “enough is enough”? Killing hundreds of thousands of people does nothing to stop terrorism, which is what you all fear. It only exacerbates the problem and creates more terrorists. Intense desperation, when left unaddressed, breeds more intense desperation. It defies all logic and common sense to assume that one can stop or prevent terrorism through violent means or economic sanction. What will it take for you all to realize that you cannot trust the government that leads you at this very moment? The government that has made you hated for your nationality throughout the world in which you were once revered and respected. The government that lied to you and made you believe that Iraq was out to get you and that they were somehow behind the awful attacks on 9/11. The government that is now directly responsible for the deaths of 100,000 people, at minimum. The government that is, as I write this, trying to convince you that a nation with the same first 3 letters as Iraq is trying to hurt us. How many times must you be deceived before you stop believing the lie? Judging from the divorce, spousal abuse and child abuse rates in this country, I’d say that you have less tolerance for the people that you love than you do for the government that ru(i)ns your life. How sad is that? Ask yourselves these questions every morning while you brush your teeth and style your hair after 4 hours of restless sleep so that you can hurry up and sit in horrible traffic alongside dozens of soccer moms riding alone in their Ford Expeditions and Chevy Suburbans while putting on too much makeup in order to get to that job that barely pays your bills yet you cannot afford to lose.

Then again, why should I expect so much introspection from a people who display little to no sense of personal accountability? For a minute there, I almost forgot that I live in the nation of “It’s not my fault”. A nation full of people who rely on Dr. Phil and Oprah to give them advice on living, while not realizing that those two people have no real basis in reality any longer because they are far richer than you will ever be and they got that way by dispensing “invaluable advice” to morons like you. A nation that watches television and sees the commercials for the latest in erectile dysfunction treatments and thinks that this is the most important advancement in science ever. A nation that thinks that the latest display of Britney Spears’ well-used vagina on national television while getting out of her car immediately after plowing into a parked car while giggling and exclaiming “Oops, I did it again” is perfectly acceptable as tonight’s top story.

Prove me wrong. I challenge you.


With total sincerity;

Vincent R. ******