Wednesday, October 31, 2007

My Letter to the Editor

Do you think that they will print this?


To Whom It May Concern (which is ALL of you):

What is it that you are all so afraid of? Is it death? If it is, I can guarantee you with 100% certainty that death is something that you cannot escape, no matter who or where it comes from.

Is it the death of a loved one? If so, I can guarantee you with 100% certainty that neither they, nor you, nor I can stop that either.

Is it terrorism? If so, I can guarantee you, although not 100%, that the government that you cowards have charged with coddling you cannot and, more importantly, will not protect you from. Just look at what happened at Virginia Tech. Where was your PATRIOT Act then?

There are only 4 absolute truths in human life. They are as follows: you must eat food, you must drink water, you must breathe air and you must die. That’s it. Nothing else in life is absolute. Nothing else in life is mandatory.

For me, however, there is one other thing that is necessary in my life. That necessity is freedom. That necessity is the liberty which was guaranteed to me by the United States Constitution, written by men much more intelligent and far wiser than I. That necessity is the freedom which is so bravely defended and upheld by men and women much more courageous than I. That necessity is the freedom which is the very life blood of the nation that we call home. That nation which was, at one time, a brightly shining beacon of hope and an example for all to follow. That nation which has been tarnished, as of late, by men and women who are hungry for power and drunken with greed. That nation which has been buried under massive quantities of incompetence and sociopathy. My necessity is the full restoration of my home and seeing her taking her rightful place at the forefront of the cause of freedom the world over. Not through empire-building. Not through force. Not at the barrel of a rifle or the exploding of a bomb dropped from the air or a missile fired from miles away. No. I want my country to spread freedom or, more accurately, the desire for freedom through example and by displays of even-handed compassion.

When are the rest of you cowards going to wake up and see that your desire for safety is costing you the very thing that you were born into? When are you going to wake up and tell your leaders that you will not sacrifice your freedoms for safety, not even for a second and not even temporarily, particularly when they are so inept at protecting you? When are you going to stop quaking in your shoes and hiding behind the skirts of your mothers and say “enough is enough”? Killing hundreds of thousands of people does nothing to stop terrorism, which is what you all fear. It only exacerbates the problem and creates more terrorists. Intense desperation, when left unaddressed, breeds more intense desperation. It defies all logic and common sense to assume that one can stop or prevent terrorism through violent means or economic sanction. What will it take for you all to realize that you cannot trust the government that leads you at this very moment? The government that has made you hated for your nationality throughout the world in which you were once revered and respected. The government that lied to you and made you believe that Iraq was out to get you and that they were somehow behind the awful attacks on 9/11. The government that is now directly responsible for the deaths of 100,000 people, at minimum. The government that is, as I write this, trying to convince you that a nation with the same first 3 letters as Iraq is trying to hurt us. How many times must you be deceived before you stop believing the lie? Judging from the divorce, spousal abuse and child abuse rates in this country, I’d say that you have less tolerance for the people that you love than you do for the government that ru(i)ns your life. How sad is that? Ask yourselves these questions every morning while you brush your teeth and style your hair after 4 hours of restless sleep so that you can hurry up and sit in horrible traffic alongside dozens of soccer moms riding alone in their Ford Expeditions and Chevy Suburbans while putting on too much makeup in order to get to that job that barely pays your bills yet you cannot afford to lose.

Then again, why should I expect so much introspection from a people who display little to no sense of personal accountability? For a minute there, I almost forgot that I live in the nation of “It’s not my fault”. A nation full of people who rely on Dr. Phil and Oprah to give them advice on living, while not realizing that those two people have no real basis in reality any longer because they are far richer than you will ever be and they got that way by dispensing “invaluable advice” to morons like you. A nation that watches television and sees the commercials for the latest in erectile dysfunction treatments and thinks that this is the most important advancement in science ever. A nation that thinks that the latest display of Britney Spears’ well-used vagina on national television while getting out of her car immediately after plowing into a parked car while giggling and exclaiming “Oops, I did it again” is perfectly acceptable as tonight’s top story.

Prove me wrong. I challenge you.


With total sincerity;

Vincent R. ******

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Fact or Fiction? You Decide

Okay. Let me start out by stating, for the record, that I did not write the article that follows. I was looking at my favorite website (WhatReallyHappened) and a link was posted there redirecting to this. I am posting this story in full because it states, almost verbatim, my theory about what happened on Rudy Ghouliani's version of Christmas, 9/11. SO read on and determine for yourselves what you think. Then let me know.

-Vince

TBR News October 22, 2007

SOURCE


Editor’s note: We have always taken a highly dubious view of the many stories of a conspiratorial nature that have sprung up after the 9/11 attack. It is obvious that many are not based on facts nor logic but the continuing flood of doubt certainly indicates that the American public is generally disillusioned and has turned to theory to explain matters that to them cannot be explained away. Some of this questioning is very much to the point and it is very obvious that much has been put out as deliberate disinformation. However, when we received the attached article, we read it through very carefully, prepared to push the delete button but of all the various theories and suppositions offered to date, it makes the most sense. And, unlike many other suppositions and theories, it stands up will to the application of known, provable facts. So in this issue, we will devote almost all the space to this article and would certainly welcome reasoned responses. The Editor

Controlling the News

Some three months ago, I assumed my duties at a national media chain.

Shortly after I arrived, a senior staff member, a woman of some age and great determination, took ill with what was diagnosed as a form of cancer and she had to take a protracted medical leave to have it treated. After she had been gone a month, corporate became concerned because she was the one who received and allotted stories on national security.

Her prognosis was guarded ,so my immediate superior, at the top of the food chain, told me to look into her files and see if there was anything that might be needed currently. She had four large filing cabinets in her office, all locked. Before having them opened, I checked with the staff at her clinic and explained our position.

Her oncologist told me that she might recover in time but would not be able to return to work for at least six months. Later that night, we had a discreet locksmith come into the building. I personally guided them past our security people downstairs in the lobby. It took about five minutes to open all the locks and they then left.

For the next three days, I personally waded through hundreds of files going back to the Eisenhower presidency. Most of the material was interesting but little of it was of any current use.

However, in one cabinet, there were stacks of what appeared, and later proved , to be copies sent to our staffer by Israeli sources, both from the Israeli Embassy people in D.C. and from other sources in Israel. These were very interesting (to say the very least) and many bore on the current situation in the Middle East.

One file in particular was astonishing.

It was an Israeli post mortem analysis of the 9-11 attack, complied from their inside sources in May of 2003, and one of the most remarkable historical chronicles I have ever read.

That file in particular had a note with her name printed at the top that it was never to be shown to anyone under any circumstances. Reading it through, I can see why. I put all the other files back in place and made photo copies of some of the more sensitive ones before doing so.

That’s the background. And here is the complete report.

You will note that there are a number of comments and explanations in italics. Those are mine and are taken from reliable sources and duly noted.

Insofar as controlling the news is concerned, this is a prime, even classic, example of that oeuvre. When you read it, you will understand why no media outlet in the United States would ever dare address its contents.

AN ANALYSIS OF THE TERRORIST ATTACKS ON AMERICAN TARGETS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 WITH APPROPRIATE BACKGROUND INFORMATION

· The Initial attack on the World Trade Center

On Friday, February 26, 1993, at approximately 12:18 PM, a huge car bomb exploded in the Secret Service section of the underground garage of the World Trade Center in New York. The blast killed five people and injured many more The concrete ceiling over the Path subway station collapsed and the casualties were killed by the debris. The blast destroyed three floors of reinforced concrete and set off fires that sent dense clouds of smoke up into one of the two towers. Power was interdicted and the lighting and elevator systems were not functioning.

Many thousands of office workers had to be evacuated . There was great chaos in the building with occupants breaking windows to get air and filling the stairwells with a panic stricken mass of fleeing people. This attack was the work of a handful of amateur Muslims who were soon apprehended and tried. Four of them, Nidal Ayvad, Mohammed Salameh, Amad Ajaj and Mahmud Aboulhalma were tried and convicted of this act and in May of 1994 were sent to prison for life. Their putative leader, one Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, a New York area religious leader, was also sentenced to life for his controlling role in the attack.

The issues of this bomb attack were quite simple. Muslim fundamentalists had tried to destroy a major American financial institution. That they were amateurs and very inept was beside the point. Other, better organized and funded groups would note the disruption and panic and use it for future such attempts.

The Americans are not anywhere as competent in dealing with terrorists as we are. We have been intimately involved with them since before 1948. As usual, the American media made a large production of it for about a week and then it simply vanished.

The attitude of the Clinton administration was that they did not want to disturb the American Muslim population and in the end, viewed the attack as an aberration that was unlikely to be repeated. The terrorists were viewed as a group of rank amateurs and the matter was not pursued. We have good rapport with the Central Intelligence Agency and have many of our people employed there but this is a domestic matter and these internal matters are addressed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation which is not as friendly with us as other agencies. They have been instructed to cooperate with our people on such things but are very sparing in this cooperation. In summation, the Americans did not learn from this attack and this will be dealt with later in this report.

· Muslim extremists in US

Because of very lax, almost incompetent, enforcement of American immigration laws, many Muslim terrorists go to America to conduct their plotting, secure in the knowledge that unless they commit a crime, no one in authority will bother with them. They are free to enter, overstay their short-term visas and go to ground without fear of detection. Because many of these individuals and groups are a distinct threat to us, we have sought and obtained permission from the American authorities to send our counter intelligence people into their country and keep these potential terrorists under close surveillance.

Part of the agreement permitting this is that we were to keep the FBI fully appraised of anything we might find. They also agreed to supply us with information. This was rarely fully forthcoming so we set up our own surveillance, using telephonic systems we controlled. Also, we have been able to track bank records without any difficulty and can immediately locate funds coming into the United States from suspect foreign banks, known to act as conduits for terrorist funding. Because the FBI is often not particularly responsive or cooperative, we, in turn, only inform them of matters of common interest when absolutely necessary.

· Mossad Observations

Due to our investigations, we early on learned that known Muslim terrorists and suspected terror cells were primarily located in Phoenix, Arizona, as well as in both the Miami and Hollywood, Florida areas and once this had been ascertained, these groups were kept under close local surveillance from December 2000 to April 2001. The terrorists were watched daily and all telephone usage was closely observed. They often used codes when talking both inside the United States and overseas but these were fairly easily broken.

· Specific Activities of Mossad in US against terrorists

We were aware that several terrorist cells were operating in Germany, thanks to cooperation with the German BND and another agency. In 1996 and 1997, we were watching a number of suspected terrorists, specifically one Mohammed Atta and his lieutenant, Marwan al=Shehi were located at 54 Maarienstrasse in Hamburg We learned from telephone intercepts and one of our undercover people, a Yemeni , that the Muslims were planning to attack American naval units ported in Yemen. This was the attack on the USS Cole on October 12, 2000.

Our informant said that the Hamburg people were talking about the idea of launching a “massive and impressive” attack on American territory that would be planned to achieve the maximum public relations effect. In 2000, we learned that Atta and others had left Germany for the United States and that they were specifically preparing to launch a spectacular terrorist attack somewhere inside the United States. We had notified the FBI headquarters about this and then learned from them that Atta and others were now resident in Hollywood, Florida.

We sent a team of Arab-speakers led by Hanan Serfati, into the area and they were able to lease apartments had rented several dwellings near the corner of 701st St. and 21st St. in Hollywood, in direct proximity to the terrorist cell. Initially, we kept them under constant surveillance and when they had left their residence, conducted a break-in and planted listening devices. Also, one of our people, speaking perfect Arabic, made personal contact with the Atta people. The team leader himself kept a residence in proximity to the American Postal Service office where it had been determined that they had a drop box. At this point, we had kept both the FBI and the CIA fully informed of our actions and they, in turn, were able to help us with mail covers and other information. .

We observed that several of the terrorists began to take flight training. Mohammed Atta and Marwan Alshehhi took jet flying lessons at Huffman Aviation, a flight school in nearby Venice. Again, we notified the FBI and CIA of this training because it indicated a probable aerial assault but neither agency expressed any genuine interest in the information.

The Arab extremist plot that led to the attacks of September 11 was hatched in Hamburg, Germany.

The main movers in this plot, Mohammed Atta, Ramzi bin al Shibh and Said Bahaji, moved into an apartment at 54 Marienstrasse in the German port city. In 1999 these men, and others, went to an al Quaeda camp in Afghanistan for training purposes. In 2000, they were back in Hamburg, boasting about planned attacks against American targets. In the same year, a number of the Hamburg Arab plotters went to the United States to attend flight training schools.

From this time onwards, until the date of the actual attacks, the Hamburg terrorist cell was in constant telephonic and fax communication with their members in America.

Shortly before the attacks, most of the Hamburg terrorists left Germany for Afghanistan and Pakistan. [Source: New York Times, August 30, 2002]

· The Actual Terrorist Plan revealed

Our undercover agent with the Atta group had proven to be of great value to them by giving them information we supplied him. As they grew more confident of him, they confided to him, and we had made tapes of these conversations, that they planned to launch a massive aerial attack against targets inside the United States. The USS Cole incident, they felt, had had very little impact on the American public. It was then that an enlargement of the 1993 car bomb attack on the World Trade Center in New York was put forward They developed the idea that if they crashed their planes into both buildings, the results would be far more dramatic than the initial attack. Later, our man also suggested a possible attack on other targets in Washington. They discussed attacks on the White House, the Capitol building and the Pentagon.

The number of terrorists available to fly commercial planes into targets was limited by the number of men who were available and could be trained. It was then decided to rule out the White House because it was such a small target and concentrate on the Pentagon and the Capitol building. Once that had been settled, the actual planning began in earnest. Our man kept us advised at all times of the progress and we, in turn, immediately notified the Israeli Embassy in Washington and our own agency, both in Tel Aviv and the United States.

· Reports to Department of Justice (FBI) and CIA to White House in re coming attacks: The President notified.

As it appeared that there would be such attacks for a certainty., our Embassy first of all contacted both the American Justice Department and the Central Intelligence Agency and appraised them of the seriousness of the situation. Eventually, the office of the Ambassador made contact with top aides of the Vice President Cheney.

It was felt at the time that Mr. Cheney would understand this matter and be able to make a presentation to the President. In a number of substantive talks with Mr. Cheney, it was mutually decided that the attacks should proceed. The reasons agreed upon were that it would at once give the President the opportunity of securing great domestic power with the legislature and the public. It would also permit, and most important, that the U.S. could attack Saddam Hussein. He was then one of our top enemies and had, in fact, bombarded us with missiles during the Gulf War.

It was felt strongly that if Hussein were removed, the country invaded by American troops and occupied, not only would the United States have secure rights to the huge Iraqi oil reserves but could set up a large, permanent military base in Iraq. This would act as a buffer for Israel and a constant threat to other Arab states plus set up a vital block between Iran, who has threatened Israel many times, and our state. Mr. Cheney, who has excellent connections with the American oil business, was entirely in favor of this on both counts.

He then made a presentation, with our people present, to the President who at once accepted all the aspects of it. The decision was made not to interdict the attack in any way and allow it to happen as it would and to await the outcome. Both the CIA and FBI were to be listened to but forbidden to act “until informed to do so.”

Mr. Cheney remarked that he did not want an attack on the Pentagon to emasculate its military leadership so he suggested that since a part of the building was empty due to interior renovations, that our man with the Atta group inform them that this empty side was where the important people worked.

When the subject of the air attack on the Capitol building, an enormous and easily hit target, the President remarked that if the Congress was sitting at the time of the attack, the death or injury of many of its members would not only add to national outrage but also strengthen his powers as a President during a wartime. There was at this point in time, no doubt that a subsequent American military attack on Iraq with ground troops would be made as discussed above.

· Influx of Foreign Intelligence Warnings

Since well before the target date, a number of high-level warnings were received by American governmental agencies concerning news of a pending terrorist attack. Because, at the highest level, it was wished not to interfere with the probability of such an attack, all such information was sent to either the Vice President or the President himself. Of course, nothing was done in fact but there were many worried conversations back and forth. The most persistent were the Germans who had developed inside information and on a number of occasions sent their finding on to the Americans. All were ignored.

In mid-August, 2001, President Vladimir Putin of Russia made a report about possible Arab attacks against domestic American targets..

On August 20, 2001, the French government made a similar report.

On August 24, 2001, the head of the Israeli Mossad reported the imminence of an Arab attack against American targets and a similar report was made by the same agency on September 7, 2001.

Domestically, the picture is not as clear but it is known that:

On June 26, 2001, the CIA informed the White House that they had intercepted foreign intelligence traffic concerning possible al-Qaeda strikes in America on July 4.

On July 1, 2001, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-California) a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee stated that her staff had advised her that there was a “major probability of a terrorist incident within the next three months.” (emphasis added)

On July 2, 2001, the FBI reported to the White House that al-Qaeda terrorist attacks outside the United States were very possible and that domestic attacks could not be discounted.

On July 5, 2001, the CIA informed the President that al-Qaeda attacks against American targets were entirely possible during the summer of that year.

On July 28, 2001, authorities in Dubai arrested one Djamel Beghal who revealed information about a planned al-Qaeda explosive attack on the U.S. Embassy in Paris

On August 6, 2001, the CIA also presented a warning to the President, explicitly concerned with terrorism inside the United States. The actual content of this message has been the subject of considerable debate, with White House officials understandably downplaying its significance.[Sources: Time May 27, 2002]

· Mossad agrees to provide special services to US in addition to updates on Atta people

After many discussions, it was determined that the American authorities could not be seen to have had real knowledge and specific information on this attack. It was also reasoned that for the attack to achieve its geo-political goals, the targets would have to be destroyed. Of course they could not destroy the Pentagon nor would this be wished. As stated above, the damage was to be in a so-called “safe” area. Our man in Florida did give to the Atta people his ‘inside” information as to which part of the building to attack and thereby save the lives of top military officials. Because the main public relations targets were the two tall buildings, it was imperative that they be either badly damaged or destroyed in full view of the cameras and the American public. Heavy loss of life was expected but mention was made of an air accident previously in which an American bomber got lost in the clouds and rammed into the Empire State building. Damage to the building was not great. It was finally agreed that we would supply certain technical assistance to absolutely insure the very visual and dramatic damage.

The Americans would have no provable connection with this. To achieve this, first a study of both buildings was made that showed they were very cheaply erected and that it would be very possible to “assist” the terrorists in their work. To do this, three teams of our people were selected with the idea that they would leave the country right away and that no one would attempt to interdict or block their exit.

The actual plan was to enter the big buildings at night as maintenance people, to proceed to the part of the buildings most likely to be struck. We knew approximately where this would happen but not certainly. Then, entering the office spaces, qjuick access through the false ceilings allowed the team to use locally-made thermite bombs with magnetic attachments which would easily and quickly be placed against a strategic number of the horizontal steel beams that held up each floor.

They were to be triggered by a specific rise in heat and were placed against each bean at an angle so as to insure burring the beam through sufficiently to materially weaken it. Our engineers calculated that first the plane would strike the building and start big fires. The fires would weaken the beams and when the heat had reached a certain point, the thermite hidden up above the false ceilings would ignite and burn through the beam. The weight of the building above would press down below and it was then hoped that everything would crash down.

As we did not know just on what floor the plane would strike, these heat bombs were placed, five to a floor, for five floors, up and down. These bombs were small enough, and safe enough, to conceal in maintenance equipment. And, in the event that the attacks were aborted for any reason, our people could easily return to the buildings afterwards and retrieve the bombs without leaving a trace. The thermite would certainly eat into the steel but would not explode and reveal its presence.

· The attack

About three weeks prior to the actual attack, the special code words were developed by Atta. In that case, the Pentagon was called ‘The Faculty of Fine Arts”, the Capitol was termed “The Faculity of Law;” and the Trade Building tower was termed, as "The Faculty of Town Planning." This, of course was part of the cover story that Atta and his people were students, following an educational career in America and used these for international telephone calls to their superiors in Saudi Arabia.

As soon as the date was fixed for the attack, the White House warned very senior American officials like the Attorney General and the Secretary of Defense and his staff, not to fly on commercial aircraft because of “rumors of possible hijackings” . No one outside of a very small circle was told the truth. And because of the possibility that the White House might still be a target of opportunity, the President went in early October, well before the projected attack date, to Texas and then later went to Florida where he and his staff remained in safety until after the attack was over.

July 26, 2001: Attorney General Ashcroft stops flying commercial airlines due to a threat assessment but “neither the FBI nor the Justice Department … would identify [to CBS] what the threat was, when it was detected or who made it.”. [Source: CBS, 7/26/01] He later walks out of his office rather than answer questions about this. [Source: Associated Press, 5/16/02]

August 4-30, 2001: President Bush spends most of August 2001 at his Crawford, Texas, ranch, nearly setting a record for the longest presidential vacation. While it is billed a “working vacation,” ABC reports Bush is doing “nothing much” aside from his regular daily intelligence briefings. [ABC 8/3/01; Washington Post 8/7/01; Salon 8/29/01] One such unusually long briefing at the start of his trip is a warning that bin Laden is planning to attack in the US, but Bush spends the rest of that day fishing (see August 6, 2001). By the end of his trip, Bush has spent 42 percent of his presidency at vacation spots or en route. [Washington Post 8/7/01] At the time, a poll shows that 55 percent of Americans say Bush is taking too much time off. [USA Today, 8/7/01] Vice President Cheney also spends the entire month in a remote location in Wyoming. [Jackson Hole News and Guide 8/15/01]

September 6-7, 2001: 4,744 put options (a speculation that the stock will go down) are purchased on United Air Lines stock as opposed to only 396 call options (speculation that the stock will go up). This is a dramatic and abnormal increase in sales of put options. Many of the UAL puts are purchased through Deutschebank/AB Brown, a firm managed until 1998 by the current Executive Director of the CIA, A.B. "Buzzy" Krongard. [New York Times; Wall Street Journal]

September 10, 2001: 4,516 put options are purchased on American Airlines as compared to 748 call options. [New York Times; Wall Street Journal.]

September 6-11, 2001: No other airlines show any similar trading patterns to those experienced by UAL and American. The put option purchases on both airlines were 600% above normal. This at a time when Reuters (September 10) issues a business report stating "airline stocks may be poised to take off."

September 6-10, 2001: Highly abnormal levels of put options are purchased in Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, AXA Re (insurance) which owns 25% of American Airlines, and Munich Re. All of these companies are directly impacted by the September 11 attacks.

On September 10, 2001, the NSA intercepted two messages in Arabic. One message read:

“Tomorrow is zero hour” and the second “The match begins tomorrow.” [Source: New York Times, August 10, 2002] On June 19, 2002, CNN reported the contents of these two National Security Agency intercepts. Other news outlets, including The Washington Post, also reported on the intercepts. [Source: New York Times, August 10, 2002]

September 10, 2001: Bush flew to Florida from Texas to visit with his brother Governor Jeb Bush. Attorney General Ashcroft rejects a proposed $58 million increase in financing for the bureau's counter-terrorism programs. On the same day, he sends a request for budget increases to the White House. It covers 68 programs, but none of them relate to counter-terrorism. He also sends a memorandum to his heads of departments, stating his seven priorities—none of them relating to counter-terrorism. This is more than a little strange, since Ashcroft stopped flying public airplanes in July due to terrorist threats (see July 26, 2001) and he told a Senate committee in May that counter-terrorism was his “highest priority.” [New York Times, 6/1/02, Guardian, 5/21/02]

· Final Observations

The final attack varied very little from the last planning stage. One of the hijacked planes, the one intended to hit the Capitol building, was crashed by action of its passengers but the other three struck their targets as anticipated. The flames, smoke and general confusion were indeed a public spectacle, seen by all of America and the buildings, beams severed when the heat reached a certain point, did collapse in great clouds. A third building was tended to from the inside, not struck by an aircraft, and because great tanks of fuel were ignited, burned until it collapsed some time later.

The carnage was not to believe and everyone involved in this felt is was a most profitable operation. As we know, the President was acclaimed as a great leader and he was then able to marshal national support into his attack on Iraq. The military campaign, as foreseen, has proven to be quick and decisive, Hussein and his henchmen were swept away and now the American military and civilian forces are in complete control of Iraq. Iran has been put on notice and we expect a large, permanent American military base in the area to act as a deterrent to any future manifestation of Arab nationalism. All of our technicians, as opposed to our intelligence people, were immediately evacuated and aside from several who were temporarily detained by American authorities, eventually all were released and returned safe home.

Now, we have moved from a defensive to an offensive posture and, with American support and a large military presence, the ever-present fears of attacks have been neutralized, hopefully for a very long time.”

Thursday, October 18, 2007

Politically Independent

You know, the trouble with being politically independent like I am is that I get lumped into the same category as these people. They are CRAZY! From what I can see, they are effectively the modern version of the Nazi Party (the real one, not the bunch of hicks running around with swastikas and jackboots on claiming to be Nazi's) with the notable exception being that they use Muslims as the scapegoat instead of Jews and they do not appear to be bent on world conquest. Then again, the original Nazi Party didn't really start out expressing that they wanted the world, did they?


Did He Really Just Say What I Think He Said?

Heard during a White House Press conference on the morning of October 17th, 2007:

Reporter: Mr. President, following up on Vladimir Putin for a moment, he said recently that next year, when he has to step down according to the constitution, as the president, he may become prime minister; in effect keeping power and dashing any hopes for a genuine democratic transition there ...

Bush: I've been planning that myself.”

That is all.

Suspension of Logic

News has recently come to light that Congressman Ron Paul currently garners the most money (among Republicans) in donations to his Presidential campaign among members of the United States military. If you don’t care to read the entire article I just linked to, just press “CTRL+ F” and type in “active members of the military”. That will show you what I am talking about. I would prefer that you read the entire article, but I cannot and will not coerce you into it. It’s a free country, right?

So, the point of this blog writing is to state that Fox News has accomplished what I would consider to be a complete suspension of logical thought. During the October 17th broadcast of their morning show “Fox & Friends”, they actually asked Congressman Paul why the military supported him so much when he constantly advocated their withdrawal from Iraq. Are they functionally retarded? Why would the members of the military NOT support Ron Paul, who advocated that they immediately return home to safety? Why would the members of the military NOT support Ron Paul, who advocates going to war only when necessary and only when declared? The way I see it, not wanting to go to war without a damn good and provable reason is the ultimate way of supporting the troops. They volunteer to fight for those Americans who cannot or will not fight for themselves and all they ask in return is to be treated fairly and sent into harm’s way only when absolutely necessary.

I could see how members of the highest echelons of the chains of command would not support Ron Paul. However, these are not the men and women who are on the ground actually fighting this war. They are not being shot at, losing limbs, being blinded, being poisoned by depleted uranium munitions’ radiation, missing their children growing up, living in constant fear that the next person that they save may be the one with a bomb strapped to their chest under their shirt or that the next trip they take across town may just be their last. No, they’re sitting in their nice, air-conditioned office back at the Pentagon or in the confines of the relatively safe Green Zone of Baghdad, waiting on the day that they can retire and go to work for one of the contractors that they serve making millions of dollars in salary and stock options. They do not actually want the war to end because, for them, it is an investment in their own financial future. It’s literally a case of money over substance of character. These people do not care at all about the well-being of anyone or anything outside of their own bank account. It’s a free-for-all. Well, not free for ALL. Maybe a more accurate term would be “free-for-some”.

Sorry, I skewed a bit there. I can’t help it. It makes me angry. I would like to think that this sort of thing makes enough people angry to actually change this, but I am a realist and I know that all I can do is to put these things out there and hope that someone is listening.

Back to the point. There is a very simple and logical reason why so many members of the United States Armed Forces would support Ron Paul. It is simply because he supports going back to the drawing board (the Constitution) and making right what has been made so wrong. If a ship is lost because its captain won’t look at a map; someone has to relieve the captain of duty, get out the map and steer the ship back on course. The United States is that ship and the US Constitution is that map. All members of the US Armed Forces take an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution upon enlistment. Here it is:

I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.”

Note that it also states that the enlistee swears to obey the orders of the President and the officers over him/her. It also says that this is to be done according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. This is the important part. The United States Constitution dictates that the US President cannot enter a war without a declaration of war by Congress. Did the current President get the approval of Congress to go to war in Iraq? Yes, he did. However, he did so by deception. This has been proven. Also, no declaration was ever made. Now, it is simply a matter of how to withdraw. Nevertheless, a soldier/Marine/sailor/airman is only required to obey lawful orders as defined by the UCMJ. The UCMJ does not override Federal law. Federal law is derived from the US Constitution and the Constitution states that we are required to recognize all treaties that we enter into. The invasion of Iraq as authorized by Congress is a direct violation of international law under Principle 6 of the Nuremberg Principles as defined by UN General Assembly Resolution 177. As far as I can tell, this is a war crime. Under this same set or rules, George W. Bush is guilty of war crimes under Principle 3 and likely more than half of our current government and a large number of people in the mass media are guilty under Principle 8. Pay particular attention to Principle 6, though. That is the one that bothers me most. I’ll go ahead and post it here, that way you don’t have to do the work:

Principle VI

The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law:

(a) Crimes against peace:
(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).

(b) War crimes:
Violations of the laws or customs of war include, but are not limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation to slave-labour or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory, murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war, of persons on the seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.

(c) Crimes against humanity:
Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhuman acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime.

Okay class… how many of the above listed items have the United States violated over the last 4 years with regards to Iraq? I can name at least 9. How about you? The point of it is that Ron Paul wishes to follow the Constitution in all matters, including matters of war, which affects the military directly since they are the ones who fight it. If we followed the Supreme Law of the Land (the Constitution) with regards to the Iraq war, then 3,829 American troops might just still be with us and MANY more might just still have all of the body parts and functions they were born with.

The things that I just said may give certain Ann Coulter/Bill O’Reilly/Sean Hannity types reason to label me a traitor or an America-hater. I assure you, the opposite is true. I absolutely LOVE my country. I would happily and readily lay down my own life for it if I knew that doing so would preserve its future, its dignity and its integrity. It is for this reason that I say the things that I say. Criticism is necessary in order to improve. Dissent is vital to the blood of a nation. Without dissent, how would anyone know that their liberties were being squashed, their rights trampled or their very existence threatened? Dissent is patriotic.

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

This, That and The Other Thing (Thinking Out Loud)

In a horrific blow to children everywhere, hopscotch is has now been deemed officially punishable by fine in the city of New York. I could be mistaken, but isn’t a child drawing on sidewalks with chalk one of the seven signs of the Apocalypse? If so, then THROW THE BOOK AT HER!!! Blue flowers drawn in chalk are the DEBIL! Actually, this is simply another bullet-point in a long and rapidly growing list of bullet-points that depict our rapid descent into a police state.

In yet another astounding display of hypocrisy, George W. Bush has stated that “the Chinese would be better off having diplomatic relations with the Tibetan leader”, referring to the Dalai Lama. What was that? Did Shrub just say that someone should pursue diplomatic relations? I guess that the glass house rule no longer exists; along with the concept of the U.S. Constitution and the obeying of International law actually meaning something. I wonder if that idiot ever listens to himself? He probably does, but fails to see the sheer stupidity that the non-brainwashed see.

If there were ever a case for violent castration, Chester Arthur Stiles is it. Who rapes a 3-year-old and videotapes it? Who even rapes a 3-year-old anyway? This guy is both sick AND stupid. I guess that’s what happens when a kid has to go through life named after a little-known former President. This guy even had the storied “molester” moustache. You know, the one where there are but a few strands of facial hair dangling above the upper lip. The one that says: “I am a MAN, baby!” At this point, I would very much like to wear his rectum as an overshoe and his esophagus as a mitten.

I remember when I was a kid and my Mom would buy me one of those chocolate bunnies at Easter and I would try and figure out which part of the delicious chocolate rabbit I would eat first. I never believed in the Easter bunny because I refused to believe that a rabbit would leave behind colored eggs and candy and, even if it did, I didn’t really want to eat anything that I though may have come from a rabbit’s ass. Anyway, that isn’t the point of this paragraph. The point of it is that there is a new art exhibit in which an artist has carved an “anatomically correct”, life-sized statue of Jesus out of chocolate. If you were going to eat that, where would you start? I think that had my mom brought home one of those for Easter, I would have immediately shat another sort of statue of equal size, albeit less sculpted and anatomically correct, on the living-room carpet.

Thursday, October 11, 2007

Investigate Your State (Knowledge Really IS Power)

I am sure that most of you are familiar with the United States Bill of Rights (for those of you who are in the United States) and, sadly, to a lesser extent the United States Constitution. But how many of you are aware of what is contained in the Constitution of your own State or Commonwealth? For that matter, how many of you are even aware of the fact that your State or Commonwealth even has a Constitution?

I see a lot of people running around screaming how they are United States citizens and that they have rights, but I wonder if they even know what those rights are. I see a lot of people running around saying how we should support the troops, but I wonder if these people even know what it is that our troops fight for and why we should support them. These documents were written for YOU so that your freedom would carry a guarantee. In the span of time that most of you have spent surfing the internet for whatever the latest catastrophe that Britney Spears has been involved in, you could have read the Bill of Rights for whatever State you’re in. Spend about 20 minutes each day investigating who is running for what office in your locality or State and what they stand for. It isn’t that hard. I hear people say: “I don’t like politics”. Well, do you like being free? Knowing and exercising your rights isn’t political. It’s a part of being a free human. Rights are like muscles. If you do not use them, they atrophy and lose their strength. One must exercise them if one wants to keep them. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees your right to keep and bear arms, meaning weapons. There is no greater weapon than the human mind with a will to be free. Don’t let your pursuit of convenience or your pursuit of material wealth or your pursuit of pop culture knowledge get in the way of your pursuit of true freedom. If you do, your access to convenience, material wealth and pop culture knowledge will go away. I promise you that.

So, I live in Georgia. Here is the Bill of Rights as spelled out in the Constitution for the State of Georgia. You can find a link to the Constitution for your State by following this link. Go forth and fill thy brain with knowledge of freedom, my young padawan. In this case, knowledge really is power. If you know your rights and the Government knows that you know them, then they cannot lie to you and take advantage of your ignorance.

CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA

PREAMBLE

To perpetuate the principles of free government, insure justice to all, preserve peace,

Promote the interest and happiness of the citizen and of the family, and transmit to posterity

The enjoyment of liberty, we the people of Georgia, relying upon the protection and guidance

Of Almighty God, do ordain and establish this Constitution.

ARTICLE I.

BILL OF RIGHTS

SECTION I.

RIGHTS OF PERSONS

Paragraph I. Life, liberty, and property. No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or

property except by due process of law.

Paragraph II. Protection to person and property; equal protection. Protection to person

and property is the paramount duty of government and shall be impartial and complete.

No person shall be denied the equal protection of the laws.

Paragraph III. Freedom of conscience. Each person has the natural and inalienable

Right to worship God, each according to the dictates of that person’s own conscience; and

No human authority should, in any case, control or interfere with such right of conscience.

Paragraph IV. Religious opinions; freedom of religion. No inhabitant of this state shall

Be molested in person or property or be prohibited from holding any public office or trust

On account of religious opinions; but the right of freedom of religion shall not be so construed

As to excuse acts of licentiousness or justify practices inconsistent with the peace and

Safety of the state.

Paragraph V. Freedom of speech and of the press guaranteed. No law shall be passed

to curtail or restrain the freedom of speech or of the press. Every person may speak, write,

and publish sentiments on all subjects but shall be responsible for the abuse of that liberty.

Paragraph VI. Libel. In all civil or criminal actions for libel, the truth may be given in

evidence; and, if it shall appear to the trier of fact that the matter charged as libelous is true,

the party shall be discharged.

Paragraph VII. Citizens, protection of. All citizens of the United States, resident in this

state, are hereby declared citizens of this state; and it shall be the duty of the General

Assembly to enact such laws as will protect them in the full enjoyment of the rights, privileges,

and immunities due to such citizenship.

Paragraph VIII. Arms, right to keep and bear. The right of the people to keep and bear

arms shall not be infringed, but the General Assembly shall have power to prescribe the

manner in which arms may be borne.

Paragraph IX. Right to assemble and petition. The people have the right to assemble

peaceably for their common good and to apply by petition or remonstrance to those vested

with the powers of government for redress of grievances.

Paragraph X. Bill of attainder; ex post facto laws; and retroactive laws. No bill of

attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or laws impairing the obligation of contract or

making irrevocable grant of special privileges or immunities shall be passed.

Paragraph XI. Right to trial by jury; number of jurors; selection and compensation of

jurors. (a) The right to trial by jury shall remain inviolate, except that the court shall render

judgment without the verdict of a jury in all civil cases where no issuable defense is filed

and where a jury is not demanded in writing by either party. In criminal cases, the defendant

shall have a public and speedy trial by an impartial jury; and the jury shall be the

judges of the law and the facts.

(b) A trial jury shall consist of 12 persons; but the General Assembly may prescribe any

number, not less than six, to constitute a trial jury in courts of limited jurisdiction and in

superior courts in misdemeanor cases.

(c) The General Assembly shall provide by law for the selection and compensation of

persons to serve as grand jurors and trial jurors.

Paragraph XII. Right to the courts. No person shall be deprived of the right to prosecute

or defend, either in person or by an attorney, that person’s own cause in any of the

courts of this state.

Paragraph XIII. Searches, seizures, and warrants. The right of the people to be secure

in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures

shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue except upon probable cause supported by

oath or affirmation particularly describing the place or places to be searched and the persons

or things to be seized.

Paragraph XIV. Benefit of counsel; accusation; list of witnesses; compulsory process.

Every person charged with an offense against the laws of this state shall have the privilege

and benefit of counsel; shall be furnished with a copy of the accusation or indictment and,

on demand, with a list of the witnesses on whose testimony such charge is founded; shall

have compulsory process to obtain the testimony of that person’s own witnesses; and shall

be confronted with the witnesses testifying against such person.

Paragraph XV. Habeas corpus. The writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended

unless, in case of rebellion or invasion, the public safety may require it.

Paragraph XVI. Self-incrimination. No person shall be compelled to give testimony

tending in any manner to be self-incriminating.

Paragraph XVII. Bail; fines; punishment; arrest, abuse of prisoners. Excessive bail

shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments

inflicted; nor shall any person be abused in being arrested, while under arrest, or in prison.

Paragraph XVIII. Jeopardy of life or liberty more than once forbidden. No person shall

be put in jeopardy of life or liberty more than once for the same offense except when a new

trial has been granted after conviction or in case of mistrial.

Paragraph XIX. Treason. Treason against the State of Georgia shall consist of insurrection

against the state, adhering to the state´s enemies, or giving them aid and comfort. No

person shall be convicted of treason except on the testimony of two witnesses to the same

overt act or confession in open court.

Paragraph XX. Conviction, effect of. No conviction shall work corruption of blood or

forfeiture of estate.

Paragraph XXI. Banishment and whipping as punishment for crime. Neither banishment

beyond the limits of the state nor whipping shall be allowed as a punishment for

crime.

Paragraph XXII. Involuntary servitude. There shall be no involuntary servitude within

the State of Georgia except as a punishment for crime after legal conviction thereof or for

contempt of court.

Paragraph XXIII. Imprisonment for debt. There shall be no imprisonment for debt.

Paragraph XXIV. Costs. No person shall be compelled to pay costs in any criminal case

except after conviction on final trial.

Paragraph XXV. Status of the citizen. The social status of a citizen shall never be the

subject of legislation.

Paragraph XXVI. Exemptions from levy and sale. The General Assembly shall protect

by law from levy and sale by virtue of any process under the laws of this state a portion of

the property of each person in an amount of not less than $1,600.00 and shall have authority

to define to whom any such additional exemptions shall be allowed; to specify the

amount of such exemptions; to provide for the manner of exempting such property and for

the sale, alienation, and encumbrance thereof; and to provide for the waiver of said exemptions

by the debtor.

Paragraph XXVII. Spouse´s separate property. The separate property of each spouse

shall remain the separate property of that spouse except as otherwise provided by law.

Paragraph XXVIII. Fishing and hunting. The tradition of fishing and hunting and the

taking of fish and wildlife shall be preserved for the people and shall be managed by law

and regulation for the public good.

Paragraph XXIX. Enumeration of rights not denial of others. The enumeration of

rights herein contained as a part of this Constitution shall not be construed to deny to the

people any inherent rights which they may have hitherto enjoyed.